Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack
"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 10 September 2020 18:11 UTC
Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4A63A0BBC for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A_rAC6WsRa_L for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D58443A0B87 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08AI9JPI011764; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:11:05 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=bGnR1YLaqPBYlh4MSY5boZca1vLU+fDOvdhBxlozQvw=; b=HKNYOueSgEY0L3BCwgnHU6VbxdjjEjm3RPZQ4O7SnW55I2/71HbX/ZHG6RATTXlKXzus qH2l7Kjaj1T4tGgssGXR3KsdMucomm530ShecCL5uN+GKdS/MeSN89YvrzUjCzT073S+ B3cbnla4eaDUnxOxo0+4Jep/GvDnReQfGUbySzDER2gprnXY6AyS+XV0PprDrYsMWzDk bZZ+OvBUu/es4uGKgGRGrv5kG3rbCj1tLaAHnNn2tvQwyOvrfUQj/y3MSC5pr492IvTd eqAqAnJjbP9BsVKbBA1ukEyi3rJgHbxDs6kdJav8vTXvIM7poKawmlywBmUP/nxhWcon 5Q==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33byj77h0v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:11:05 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08AI1qYo011182; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:11:04 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 33c60xmntn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:11:04 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:11:03 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 14:11:03 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Achim Kraus <achimkraus@gmx.net>, Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Static DH timing attack
Thread-Index: AQHWhrp+9EGmAKHnM0S2YOV3OYQKzqlhmhsFgACKKwCAAAnAAA==
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:11:02 +0000
Message-ID: <F5B3E4EB-1342-428B-B28B-CCDB323BAF86@akamai.com>
References: <5595BB40-3AFD-4327-B7B7-5E63FFC594DD@akamai.com> <1599729784370.87441@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <fff1a66a-0a49-cfbd-461a-c1d0ed3aeaaa@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <fff1a66a-0a49-cfbd-461a-c1d0ed3aeaaa@gmx.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.40.20081201
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <541582F329370D4BB16CF53352662D44@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-10_05:2020-09-10, 2020-09-10 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=791 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009100165
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-10_05:2020-09-10, 2020-09-10 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=735 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009100168
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/CxykoH422kfzKGPXE8w9iB6v4GI>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 18:11:16 -0000
Much as I hesitate to disagree with Peter:
> Reason the second: Telling people not to use static-ephemeral DH will mean
> telling them not to use 25519 key exchange, which will make their heads
> asplode.
Do you mean this because people will confuse DH with ECDHE ?
- [TLS] Static DH timing attack Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Dmitry Belyavsky
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Karthik Bhargavan
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Achim Kraus
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Dan Brown
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Hugo Krawczyk
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Russ Housley
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Filippo Valsorda
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Filippo Valsorda
- Re: [TLS] Static DH timing attack Lanlan Pan