Return-Path: <xuelei.fan@vimino.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658D71289B5
 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
 header.d=vimino.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id mfLQ_bNRNn0N for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:10:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CA7D1315B9
 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id m77so84211870lfe.0
 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vimino.com; s=google; 
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=BLvFl3K43Ji0biz8xdlCv7ZC8uNi2G1cScCzC4JGAXY=;
 b=fo/YoNV2d2XM3PFcqEsGp0vMrfXp0gqA+IEg0Mrm8nINBZzLPF1sT5wlnvgcHK/Qm/
 cdpFJRCb2vBYFyx/h+hilaKLDwD8rHQx+lT82140fvzoNw1UgeqRSmGDByjjSrAlLBGx
 AyZfMkGyd33rmdRpD0n+mWVVXYW8uSd2w9H5s=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=BLvFl3K43Ji0biz8xdlCv7ZC8uNi2G1cScCzC4JGAXY=;
 b=tjEnpiQUt0x5MQ3WRcrXZ6PhUuyzxXaOtj3W6deijr4r3o66/GHdfsDaIOGbdDx3ni
 U3Wl3Su66RaFUL8efU/hd5UrKBREUTiM8LPUjvvSVKDwQouEWQwRJ6+CKViViToAKE2d
 LrRDktlp8wKCbE4/aQOBKPjrtXmiGwmEcnHjz80ZXPh+eeapJAfTkHBxnw7dzM0ekcYd
 n6WvZD1dn1vEbjB1zgEb4dmK1aez4STiKkvG6qOuE+PxK1ulSh7kEO1arPQg5d4E9Irj
 L+lm7ALOCFWHtpvPQXHv9wxRg82fjjPWdq4GLra4zN2AGCBH1ELja+C7b3FePPhWIzhd
 TH/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxRt4GzLLL40HWldJ+TWeTQMLbx8aSbEBRWjfak4GC7D6KBerVG
 Bwp8jKtRotGzE+aeRmJkGTxW/wRvnblQSxc=
X-Received: by 10.25.92.18 with SMTP id q18mr641317lfb.13.1498003801586; Tue,
 20 Jun 2017 17:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.22.92 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [148.87.23.8]
From: Xuelei Fan <xuelei.fan@vimino.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:10:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAgBOhsQT78JrWA6VRx158wOE0gR-VOFawcuvqjwopebDcGA2A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0e7e2077584305526d30be"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/D01Iy32HrFianCA3pKaSt26_hJU>
Subject: [TLS] The use of "trusted_ca_keys" for server certificate selection
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working
 group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:10:06 -0000

--94eb2c0e7e2077584305526d30be
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi,

In section 4.4.2.2, "Server Certificate Selection", of TLS 1.3 draft:
   https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-20#section-4.4.2.2

It is stated:

   -  The "server_name" and "trusted_ca_keys" extensions [RFC6066
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6066>] are
      used to guide certificate selection.  As servers MAY require the
      presence of the "server_name" extension, clients SHOULD send this
      extension, when applicable.

The "trusted_ca_keys" extension is not used in TLS 1.3, and is replaced
with the "certificate_authorities" extension (Section 4.2.4):

   The "trusted_ca_keys" extension, which serves a similar purpose
   [RFC6066 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6066>], but is more
complicated, is not used in TLS 1.3 (although
   it may appear in ClientHello messages from clients which are offering
   prior versions of TLS).


I guess it is a typo or a missed update to use the the "trusted_ca_keys"
extension for server certificate selection in section 4.4.2.2.  The
"certificate_authorities" extension should be used instead.

Regards,
Xuelei Fan

--94eb2c0e7e2077584305526d30be
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>In section 4.4.2.2, &quot;Server Ce=
rtificate Selection&quot;, of TLS 1.3 draft:</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=
=3D"https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-20#section-4.4.2.2">ht=
tps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-20#section-4.4.2.2</a><br></=
div><div><br></div><div>It is stated:</div><div><pre class=3D"gmail-newpage=
">   -  The &quot;server_name&quot; and &quot;trusted_ca_keys&quot; extensi=
ons [<a href=3D"https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6066" title=3D"&quot;Transpo=
rt Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions&quot;">RFC6066</a=
>] are
      used to guide certificate selection.  As servers MAY require the
      presence of the &quot;server_name&quot; extension, clients SHOULD sen=
d this
      extension, when applicable.</pre></div><div>The &quot;trusted_ca_keys=
&quot; extension is not used in TLS 1.3, and is replaced with the &quot;cer=
tificate_authorities&quot; extension (Section 4.2.4):<br></div><div><pre cl=
ass=3D"gmail-newpage">   The &quot;trusted_ca_keys&quot; extension, which s=
erves a similar purpose
   [<a href=3D"https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6066" title=3D"&quot;Transpor=
t Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions&quot;">RFC6066</a>=
], but is more complicated, is not used in TLS 1.3 (although
   it may appear in ClientHello messages from clients which are offering
   prior versions of TLS).</pre></div><div><br></div><div>I guess it is a t=
ypo or a missed update to use the the &quot;trusted_ca_keys&quot; extension=
 for server certificate selection in section 4.4.2.2.=C2=A0 The &quot;certi=
ficate_authorities&quot; extension should be used instead.</div><div><br></=
div><div>Regards,</div><div>Xuelei Fan</div><div><pre class=3D"gmail-newpag=
e"><br></pre></div><div><pre class=3D"gmail-newpage"><br></pre></div></div>

--94eb2c0e7e2077584305526d30be--

