Re: [TLS] ECH-10 interop test server
Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 07 April 2021 22:12 UTC
Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635DD3A2BB5
for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id yL9MCES1i_NI for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08D233A2BE4
for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id b10so88313iot.4
for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=yCzGe9NZWP+mHMtct9SrzSPHPcSkxFEYLC9WfeUs0DY=;
b=QgejtLBTq4TAlx2FzCqVMoDaUJo/p/EeObUh30gy223uUxPIO7QPedAjD9iTdbe5hD
MDmbNYEDPbDrgvh03mcy2Hm6uVPlOcwJR8AwkAdiMHcisynHkwi/FJ1vNS1CvxzEqu4P
GSaAbVz6A0nnSATmdxPOgl6RWh5Zp17+qr013or9GFZrid6B27tzJ9fZEPHrETAmg0wZ
X/A4FWfyIDSJjm5exPaHs2Dwye2c2dzyHl6wLQkwbob4d4oXxJApGGokvThaV/pF0pWS
X/G3ATYtm7LXZH4FtDKb8y2NVO7w/sUGmNClY4K08mZ2sK7BOPuI672AfpfYGUPS7SFl
lOiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=yCzGe9NZWP+mHMtct9SrzSPHPcSkxFEYLC9WfeUs0DY=;
b=V/GNuLNqOqPSVnOJCi80eQPrRpW81pYcKZzOKqw7j0iZqiX/T2LcheP4sPQckM8Lon
IcjfAEiDhw4rse+nBocs5/vbiAtumJBu+ozd16UbCCXadZB8FkM7Bov4UzSEz5mdOJKl
qP0odkw7wkExFuJxTxyY+Z8Q9qsM4vvrBKjwtTlg4yia71g61peYLm36R90918R3i40K
JH5bWrSAP1EzNQqTnmwiFI6ICzbNoRrHMbjitciKt8qKo6bH8+L8BKcLJJouSPfo8aQT
LoFk6I3kDmgk72VqcZOFGU16F4lYkg0+zk+w9DJZOnOkvoCNZDZXZTWZoJDPDPGDhoMa
guJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531nyZ4CbJsZQ0Ol6dj11Xir9ObJ35fH11ICrQmaOnHKMsCcv5SW
U4kJtyt7HsjRNWiWCJf1BJiJsB+QbMmj3Ei8HIE9eOgkGtKkYA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxOVrOG/vY4OL0Guko9c/yhDn0vnfGVBL3j4mtljumI8bFv7d/zNvJ0AKEA6OSdQgODxDdAzgr0x4jyna4sLyU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:d4e:: with SMTP id
d14mr5749784jak.103.1617833513287;
Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAG2Zi23mtGwmpNSvUigOdph8y05MvWV_uGm8H0W=vbRFdZ6euw@mail.gmail.com>
<0069a206-7ca9-e79c-42ae-f2c7633bcc7d@cs.tcd.ie>
<05aa52f8-056d-9d68-28f0-b38513cf43ac@cs.tcd.ie>
<CAG2Zi20WVBgAQiqjGTmcANsffOUyXypP3CdNozBrzd+4j764yA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG2Zi20WVBgAQiqjGTmcANsffOUyXypP3CdNozBrzd+4j764yA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:11:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Syb8mP+R84TYwKkwebfTVePuUdNi12yiCjQ1b8nLesRnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Patton <cpatton=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>,
"<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dd821805bf693722"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/DSu7FMovOBDg0zo0Oeht8ao2hkY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] ECH-10 interop test server
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working
group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>,
<mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>,
<mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 22:12:00 -0000
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:09 PM Christopher Patton <cpatton= 40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > (In case it helps someone else...) Is there any way that the >> HTTP response content could differ if ECH succeeded or not? >> I'm seeing the same 302 response in either case I think but >> maybe there's some specific pathname or something that'd >> result in different HTTP responses? >> > > That's right, we're just redirecting most HTTP requests to the spec right > now. > FWIW, I found this confusing as well. I'd expect a 200 "It worked!" response if ECH interoperated. thanks, Rob
- [TLS] ECH-10 interop test server Christopher Patton
- Re: [TLS] ECH-10 interop test server Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] ECH-10 interop test server Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] ECH-10 interop test server Christopher Patton
- Re: [TLS] ECH-10 interop test server Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] ECH-10 interop test server Christopher Patton
- Re: [TLS] ECH-10 interop test server Rob Sayre