IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] WG: New Version Notification for draft-bruckert-brainpool-for-tls13-00.txt

"Bruckert, Leonie" <Leonie.Bruckert@secunet.com> Mon, 03 September 2018 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Leonie.Bruckert@secunet.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534C2130DD3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 01:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hb2UyPLyKHwh for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 01:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298E112DD85 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 01:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE0B2018E for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 12:24:59 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eekm3G7N0bK2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 12:24:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-essen-02.secunet.de (mail-essen-02.secunet.de [10.53.40.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 163452008A for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 12:24:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MAIL-ESSEN-01.secunet.de ([fe80::1c79:38b7:821e:46b4]) by mail-essen-02.secunet.de ([fe80::4431:e661:14d0:41ce%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 10:25:14 +0200
From: "Bruckert, Leonie" <Leonie.Bruckert@secunet.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] WG: New Version Notification for draft-bruckert-brainpool-for-tls13-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUQPWlf4ORiwH5jEuKN+gT8h8traTZ4EGQgAMKRYCAADPqgIABDRTw
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 08:25:13 +0000
Message-ID: <DE8E4C1F24911E469CC24DD4819274AA2C1D45B8@mail-essen-01.secunet.de>
References: <153569768626.3253.16680905114240291331.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DE8E4C1F24911E469CC24DD4819274AA2C1D4534@mail-essen-01.secunet.de> <20180902161231.2b44cc2d@computer> <20180902171819.GE28851@straasha.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180902171819.GE28851@straasha.imrryr.org>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-g-data-mailsecurity-for-exchange-state: 0
x-g-data-mailsecurity-for-exchange-error: 0
x-g-data-mailsecurity-for-exchange-sender: 23
x-g-data-mailsecurity-for-exchange-server: cbe3d3f7-b9e3-4256-b890-f24c4306a01c
x-exclaimer-md-config: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10
x-g-data-mailsecurity-for-exchange-guid: 3491D975-A147-451F-9554-FF75394F5F6D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/DaZ2OrstW5QV3VfHlaBjupw48vk>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG: New Version Notification for draft-bruckert-brainpool-for-tls13-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 08:25:21 -0000

We really don't want to restart the old debate. That's why we don't target standardization, but registration of code points only. Maybe you got this wrong.

RFC8447 adds a RECOMMENDED column to TLS Registries which allows for differentiating between entries explicitly recommended by an RFC and other entries based on a specification document only. We decided to choose the latter approach to register code points based on this I-D.  I wonder what's the purpose of this distinction if it is not offering a possibility for registering code points without full working group consensus.
 
Leonie

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: TLS [mailto:tls-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Viktor Dukhovni
Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. September 2018 19:18
An: tls@ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [TLS] WG: New Version Notification for draft-bruckert-brainpool-for-tls13-00.txt

On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 04:12:31PM +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:

> > We submitted an Internet Draft defining the usage of the Brainpool
> > Curves for TLS 1.3.
> 
> I believe it's not desirable to have a maximally large number of
> algorithms specified for TLS. To the contrary, I believe it'd be good
> to keep things as simple as possible and limit choices if there's no
> good reason for them.

Agreed.

-- 
	Viktor.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status