IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Proposed text for dnsssec chain extension draft

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 26 April 2018 04:21 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D0B127867 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 21:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.61
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL=0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L4=3.6] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DpR8EWwwgA7I for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 21:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a90.g.dreamhost.com (homie-sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BDD212426E for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 21:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a90.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a90.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF18A004B82; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 21:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=dPn/fNkExPlbng eGTHLv2/XVEiQ=; b=oovwCaCruVCTaSHgimDpUQjSCltKMzrfyZYY+tPqHuhBik 8cs+o3Y2Zrk7923oaLog+9lrDMkYFzwKzEreBgIqFTekzH9URIhJW0m3nwFSN9LR qZTAwhHMBF+hoJwcPDBA2GP7HDuhdOB5L6zIC4qIPlRs5PxpBUeD8jiro93zI=
Received: from localhost (cpe-70-123-158-140.austin.res.rr.com [70.123.158.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a90.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BAA1A004B81; Wed, 25 Apr 2018 21:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 23:15:53 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180426041552.GK25259@localhost>
References: <1D2EB7F1-B796-4459-93C2-443A7104F33A@dukhovni.org> <d5b94d58-e625-9fc0-faae-b202d10620fb@nomountain.net> <20180425145721.GH25259@localhost> <20180425154001.GI25259@localhost> <20180425154626.GJ25259@localhost> <CAOgPGoBzx5PKzd=3=OhxXdV4bQHfxqM-4xGgsvip4-Fg1NfAUA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoBzx5PKzd=3=OhxXdV4bQHfxqM-4xGgsvip4-Fg1NfAUA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Dk3WbmQh_40c9DbgEbdnJq4XPtg>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Proposed text for dnsssec chain extension draft
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 04:21:49 -0000

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:13:37PM -0700, Joseph Salowey wrote:
> This proposal is quite a bit more than just a two byte reserved field.

What, Viktor's text?  Most of it has to do with the denial of existence,
not with those two bytes.

v2.15.0 | Report a Bug | By Email