Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB131A894F for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:42:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.702 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RO3W32o8TycL for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 1.mo54.mail-out.ovh.net (1.mo54.mail-out.ovh.net [178.33.45.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A6B91A896E for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail169.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59]) by mo54.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B612FF8D0E for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:42:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (HELO queueout) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Jul 2015 16:41:02 +0200 Received: from 130.163-14-84.ripe.coltfrance.com (HELO ?10.41.51.97?) (contact@simonbernard.eu@84.14.163.130) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 31 Jul 2015 16:41:01 +0200 Message-ID: <55BB88FD.4060901@simonbernard.eu> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:41:01 +0200 From: Simon Bernard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tls@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 9871045958844037362 X-Ovh-Remote: 84.14.163.130 (130.163-14-84.ripe.coltfrance.com) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeekfedrtdelucdltddurdefkedvrddttddmucetufdoteggucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenuc X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeekfedrtdelucdltddurdefkedvrddttddmucetufdoteggucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenuc Archived-At: Subject: [TLS] DTLS epoch and resume session/handshake X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:46:23 -0000 Hi, I search in DTLS RFC 6347 if the epoch should be (re)set to 0 when we start a resume handshake, or if we keep the last used value, or the last used value+1 ? I can not any clue of that in the spec. Any idea ? Thx Simon