Re: [TLS] Closing some open comments on draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation

Michael D'Errico <mike-list@pobox.com> Fri, 11 December 2009 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mike-list@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7DE3A69FC for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:01:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.527
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g1Ki4BB4HNcH for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:01:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com [208.72.237.25]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA6E3A69DA for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:01:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1CA87BD1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:00:49 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Vy9U44/r0Zhn wtmqUOg/9Thofrg=; b=Lpkhnx7sKoP+lEEOW2SHMcr3KfUwUOaVp7lQMUa8fnVr CwvXAcsDmFmPFNN01BwaHvL8U6noMT0c5Cgtyni+NvGL+RjIPJfBjfCCAzKHXuu/ NruI0zMtwRurflj75FMBvjlzcifTkRm0Ea1LnGEPMlH+uL4ruFKqcA0isJDw/68=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lEj+Sy dkhtD32jHDmYDZSSDtYta0T+anknYnbv4+fYCwJKQt1bKmoLPU5pt+xVheU+Q7xT 8tSYk/J4LS4CpsA/jZ0Vf1SM2dIE+O52G0s8cpis6BTGqydQKrIRU3Frmcthu3NF L9R78I59rrxahSNboXoO9XcHNwtom6yyu1Jfk=
Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B30287BD0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:00:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from administrators-macbook-pro.local (unknown [24.234.114.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B181A87BCF for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:00:45 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <4B22A575.4020803@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:03:01 -0800
From: Michael D'Errico <mike-list@pobox.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tls@ietf.org
References: <20091207220244.DA1A06C5242@kilo.networkresonance.com> <4B229F51.2040109@pobox.com> <4B229FB5.3070603@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4B229FB5.3070603@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E0EAD634-E68F-11DE-9085-DC0DEE7EF46B-38729857!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com
Subject: Re: [TLS] Closing some open comments on draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:01:04 -0000

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 12/11/09 12:36 PM, Michael D'Errico wrote:
>> Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>> 1. Replace "cipher suite" with magic cipher suite value (MCSV)   
>>> throughout.
>> I'm not sure we want to call it "magic" in the RFC (even though I
>> am probably guilty of calling it that in previous messages).
>> Perhaps "special" would be a better adjective?
> 
> I think we'd rather be magic than "special" ;-)

Well, since the MCSV is an extension, but not a true extension, it
is "special" even in the sense you suggest!  ;-)

Mike