IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] [Emu] Fwd: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Mon, 01 February 2021 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADC13A13FE; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:24:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a1t6qY8gW5z8; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:24:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ACA93A13FB; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:24:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.46.129] (24-52-251-6.cable.teksavvy.com [24.52.251.6]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 579EB362; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 19:24:49 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMeR-kH_P_Lq9X8sOCvZ=u8_tGEOE2QErKX--Tk3cEg=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:24:47 -0500
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9E25ADFC-16F2-4719-B223-E34598633D2B@deployingradius.com>
References: <e669002f-caff-1e6e-e28b-d09157eb0c07@ericsson.com> <6241F0B6-C722-449E-AC3A-183DE330E7B5@deployingradius.com> <9ddd1593-3131-f5cc-d0db-74bf3db697bf@ericsson.com> <3CB58153-8CCA-4B1E-B530-BA67A6035310@deployingradius.com> <CAOgPGoA3U+XpZMY7J+KGovNx6MtAdEzRaGW33xVJdQNWSi4LVg@mail.gmail.com> <770e6a49-52fc-4e8b-91af-48f85e581fbb@www.fastmail.com> <CAOgPGoBGOMXH-kMhQSujWxnACdmBL845u0ouE0fUYc4rWtUrZg@mail.gmail.com> <ca4c526e-79a0-4fa7-abda-2b626795f068@www.fastmail.com> <3409F71E-4CE4-46BB-8079-BFBE9BE83C9A@deployingradius.com> <66157321-55DC-4831-8EF2-D75934D9024C@deployingradius.com> <20210129183220.GI21@kduck.mit.edu> <1A830492-3404-4BCC-844B-D7D950458BD9@deployingradius.com> <CABcZeBMAtmPfG0rctvO8UvnhPqY1etk=SxnonP_t6ysNxH7hVA@mail.gmail.com> <D6AAF668-86C8-4C5D-AF1E-B37F106A4D1C@deployingradius.com> <CABcZeBPES99+xo16=aSDJQbGpzM_Q+k-pWtg424Gu4UAcFbo9Q@mail.gmail.com> <FFE1B807-B055-45DF-84FA-A0D63C058729@deployingradius.com> <CABcZeBMeR-kH_P_Lq9X8sOCvZ=u8_tGEOE2QErKX--Tk3cEg=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/EFwSH_Pz1fJqrmc2mmJOpFPtBA0>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Emu] Fwd: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-13: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:24:54 -0000

On Feb 1, 2021, at 11:26 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> Yes, this is what I have in mind. So, maybe there's never any need for the server to say "I won't say anything more" after just one round trip?

  I think so, yes.

  That means of course EAP-TLS will always require 4.5 round trips.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email