IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Accept draft-turner-ssl-must-not-02 as WG item

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 15 September 2010 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C653A6BD8 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 05:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.482
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vg+MSCyvJcS1 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 05:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157153A6BD7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 05:09:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squire.local (dsl-228-11.dynamic-dsl.frii.net [216.17.228.11]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51B2B400EE for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 06:14:19 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4C90B79A.9050504@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 06:10:02 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100824 Thunderbird/3.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tls@ietf.org
References: <E1Ovj4f-0007mZ-4a@wintermute02.cs.auckland.ac.nz> <4C906E6B.4030706@extendedsubset.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C906E6B.4030706@extendedsubset.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [TLS] Accept draft-turner-ssl-must-not-02 as WG item
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:09:40 -0000

On 9/15/10 12:57 AM, Marsh Ray wrote:

> Today only a tiny
> fraction of TCP port 443 servers implement TLS 1.1 or 1.2 (827 and 11
> out of 607,249 respectively
> http://blog.ivanristic.com/Qualys_SSL_Labs-State_of_SSL_2010-v1.6.pdf).

The operative question here seems to be: what fraction of TLS clients
send SSL 2.0 ClientHello messages?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email