Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis
Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> Thu, 27 May 2010 18:13 UTC
Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4816B3A67ED for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2010 11:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZEaAafbsSchW for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 May 2010 11:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpde01.sap-ag.de (smtpde01.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E453A67EE for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 May 2010 11:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sap.corp by smtpde01.sap-ag.de (26) with ESMTP id o4RIDAOU028138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 May 2010 20:13:10 +0200 (MEST)
From: Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com>
Message-Id: <201005271813.o4RIDACs029100@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
To: jsalowey@cisco.com
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:13:10 +0200
In-Reply-To: <AC1CFD94F59A264488DC2BEC3E890DE50A782CE1@xmb-sjc-225.amer.cisco.com> from "Joseph Salowey" at May 21, 10 03:00:51 pm
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanner: Virus Scanner virwal08
X-SAP: out
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:13:28 -0000
Joseph Salowey wrote:
>
> After an offline discussion with Martin I think we really should remove
> the sentence " The client MAY omit the extension..." Omitting the
> extension seems like a really bad idea, because if the session is not
> resumed the client may establish a session with different
> characteristics than what was intended. So now we have:
Thank you for you efforts.
I'm fine with this clarification.
-Martin
PS: maybe some others (in particular who discussed this particular
topic) could provide their feedback so that Joe gets somewhat more
than deafening silence to determine whether there is consensus. ;-)
- Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis t.petch
- [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis t.petch
- Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] Text for draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis Donald Eastlake