IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF100: Agenda Requests

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sun, 05 November 2017 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C0A13FACD for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 11:05:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UwIaHP5YOsYp for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 11:05:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9262113F963 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 11:05:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id vA5J2UK5000340; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 19:04:58 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=TgstMqKTCTylPgdr9UMI48QItBtq06tHaMFX2+by0ok=; b=HKHcM6IAIggWPS3sotRHtJODHg3NTMULqDEQNG36akdtSySaMVkbotcvmer7JSRJdXd1 vWYZyijTEa9pDWecI2WXqNDRrhfN4c1sRCoZegp1HzUVPwxu0oO5zpgBoMwSnSYDimqB kpPnRZEbcfwugPPvhF1UAqn3TGDhoSTrZ6LCA4G07i8AlvkFnAqMUNN0KQyrpAT3XKpC BTmu76/cN2Y7Z1uY0vrnKsw09ot4jGutq2HYCZGdz0yCT1AQcpyeau/mvh+Kt89IlZsa dpj/8XtXE4vXpPLwdsjSKUozCqicirW07K/bjGjAeizN4Tm4NK+EbNNcfQZAMOyT/rX8 0A==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2e13ggcfpe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 05 Nov 2017 19:04:57 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id vA5J0wGB022382; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 14:04:57 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2e18vu30n8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 05 Nov 2017 14:04:57 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 14:04:56 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Sun, 5 Nov 2017 14:04:56 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
CC: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] TLS@IETF100: Agenda Requests
Thread-Index: AQHTTOWwew2Q2aAdy06XmH3DbvIHJqMBmwaAgAAAv4CABB1BAIAAbfWAgAABt4CAADI1gIAAAX8AgAAuzACAAADEAA==
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 19:04:55 +0000
Message-ID: <793608D3-3BAA-40A4-8B9A-FBF861580FF1@akamai.com>
References: <732B27C6-817B-4F02-BF5D-0EDCBDB91793@sn3rd.com> <FE182172-D69A-4451-B77B-CCD78B3AEFD1@sn3rd.com> <6B3ADE1C-1019-4C81-BA94-EA3737ADED1A@akamai.com> <efe6b92e-ab1b-aa58-e328-e4ccd11b1ecc@nomountain.net> <0A8DF483-9DAD-48CD-A1BE-A6FECE490C69@akamai.com> <CAPt1N1kx-9OsRADLm_1LDi9K3cjku0d-iVL-7yqTcs8KBWewKQ@mail.gmail.com> <376386A6-B12C-4C8B-92BA-7E187ED53DE3@akamai.com> <2F651580-211E-44F0-A3A8-A873B016E03D@fugue.com> <cfbef9f6-8bfe-4296-4606-bc7455ad8e41@nomountain.net>
In-Reply-To: <cfbef9f6-8bfe-4296-4606-bc7455ad8e41@nomountain.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.27.0.171010
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.42.251]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A9C98C6F2C79AB46B35A6A9463BBB7F4@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-11-05_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1711050275
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-11-05_04:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1711050275
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/FERg0DirZwbfPpq5EGqrp10P9hg>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF100: Agenda Requests
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2017 19:05:08 -0000

➢ At any rate, the discussion of the proposal, if there is to be one,
    belongs on the mailing list.  Having the discussion and coming to
    a conclusion 1) during a meeting 2) where none of the proponents
    is present seems like an abuse of process to me

I asked for time so that we could discuss it.  Of course, all decisions are confirmed on the mailing list and I never meant otherwise.  Sorry for assuming everyone understood.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email