Return-Path: <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F2C1A8999
 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:19:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.071
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.071 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 FRT_PROFILE2=1.981, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id JxpBh8S8F0Ur for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.auckland.ac.nz (mx4.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.248])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 750E51A897E
 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 04:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;
 d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=mail;
 t=1442402339; x=1473938339;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references:
 in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
 bh=jPgcWKMCQqcTvFx+o3k/cV7YiLUyo2VY0nJK45iqJ5M=;
 b=jBjf1beERzlt22ffUmbd7/eUWNduwM9TjeKQoMjLVVKadbBFYAR5QxfI
 o1LvfeFNZfOWJiK5sXNJMUu/XXCo6CiG1MAHsUPbsCC72CgPu6bzijzHN
 rPsZJKnXsBM6DGdprSPBOSRin2kA0gx+nMUsdOxjEm7eBPcA9yGtgRTm9
 c/KJlyZ5r+Ygnnhck9BCWpILGgTAw6JKYOPQUGVNSZq8pCmNknH9evIkr
 W7THOucK5PuSodsZByUdODmjUpE5bEqGp6sN17EFdKD3Zwk6LcXJVlokw
 nFGYy1Fnwbz4obtJWR8Wmb4Hz8Hwc/JCA5zhwQIxCG+woZBw/ZgYMtX7R g==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,538,1437393600"; d="scan'208";a="41934239"
X-Ironport-HAT: MAIL-SERVERS - $RELAYED
X-Ironport-Source: 130.216.4.125 - Outgoing - Outgoing
Received: from exchangemx.uoa.auckland.ac.nz (HELO
 uxchange10-fe3.UoA.auckland.ac.nz) ([130.216.4.125])
 by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 16 Sep 2015 23:18:57 +1200
Received: from UXCN10-TDC05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([169.254.9.47]) by
 uxchange10-fe3.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([169.254.143.234]) with mapi id
 14.03.0174.001; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 23:18:57 +1200
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "noloader@gmail.com"
 <noloader@gmail.com>, Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] TLS Provfiles (Was: Call for consensus to remove
 anonymous DH)
Thread-Index: AQHQ8FFq13KcVZ89fEGkcyYs2GLTPZ4+0CRR//8+EACAAPO8Yw==
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:18:56 +0000
Message-ID: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B0723C@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <CAH8yC8=eHzQPL6cROVK4Pm0V2FSYTL7C7csLG7p49W5LEmfo=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B070E6@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>,
 <55F92C1A.9060703@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <55F92C1A.9060703@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-NZ
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [130.216.158.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/F_BEWbWcdvk8t5HQF_5vornOH4w>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS Provfiles (Was: Call for consensus to remove
 anonymous DH)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working
 group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>,
 <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:19:02 -0000

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> writes:=0A=
=0A=
>We have BCP195 [1] that aims for the "general" case (for up to TLS1.2) and=
 a=0A=
>draft [2] (current in IESG evaluation) for the embedded case. Are those th=
e=0A=
>kind of thing you're after?=0A=
=0A=
Sort of, but since they're not part of the TLS spec they essentially don't=
=0A=
exist (I've never seen then quoted, cited, or referenced in any third-party=
=0A=
standard that deals with TLS).=0A=
=0A=
Another problem is that they're defined as a large collection of (often rat=
her=0A=
waffly) "don't do this" comments, so as a somewhat wooly blacklist rather t=
han=0A=
a clear whitelist.  So the BCPs aren't really a profile but more like 20-30=
=0A=
pages of hand-wringing.=0A=
=0A=
An actual profile of TLS would be something like MUST TLS 1.1 or above, MUS=
T=0A=
PFS suites, MUST AES and SHA256, MUST E-then-M (and by implication what isn=
't=0A=
explicitly permitted is denied).=0A=
=0A=
Peter.=

