Re: [TLS] SNI and ALPN -- which firsr?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 30 July 2014 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C8C1A01D0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oom7OS8Kvyq9 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com [72.246.2.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1523F1A01F2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:51:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721252862D; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:51:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com [172.17.120.126]) by prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422172861C; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:51:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from usma1ex-cashub.kendall.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cashub4.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.27.105.20]) by prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07C62026; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:51:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.107.26]) by USMA1EX-CASHUB4.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.20]) with mapi; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:51:29 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:51:28 -0400
Thread-Topic: [TLS] SNI and ALPN -- which firsr?
Thread-Index: Ac+sFUYgWLs5ntykSOq6OJ2udv8gfAAAStZg
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C718599EE048@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C718599EDDDB@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CABkgnnW2x9v36GkwSic6+0B=S9ZxD9X6MLq3Upqk8XqyXMOtjA@mail.gmail.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C718599EE035@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CABkgnnUL8UDdFh5KEjgA6+2fv3N0YJ0C235ZQ91cgwhqF2R=ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUL8UDdFh5KEjgA6+2fv3N0YJ0C235ZQ91cgwhqF2R=ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/F_tk58lfcX1rL8Xy2web3IMMnFA
Cc: "TLS@ietf.org \(tls@ietf.org\)" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] SNI and ALPN -- which firsr?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:51:33 -0000

> I can imagine several different, but equally valid deployment configurations
> that suggest either.

Which is what I said at the beginning :)

--  
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technologies, Cambridge MA
IM: rsalz@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz