Re: [TLS] Closing some open comments on draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation

[Nicolas Williams <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:02:44PM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I've been going through the list discussion on
> draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation and wanted to try to close on some of the
> edits people have proposed.
> 
> 4. Channel bindings: replace the end of S 1. with:
> 
>    "The data used in the extension is similar to, but not the same as, the
>    channel binding data used in [I-D.altman-tls-channel-bindings], however
>    this extension is not a generic-purpose RFC 5056 channel binding
>    facility."
> 
>    Nico, did you have other text you wanted?

RFC5056 needs to be an actual, informative reference.  Also, since we
use both Finished messages this resembles the tls-unique-for-telnet CB
most:

   The data used in the extension is similar to, but not the same as,
   the tls-unique and/or tls-unique-for-telnet channel bindings
   described in [I-D.altman-tls-channel-bindings], however this
   extension is not a generic-purpose RFC 5056 [RFC5056] channel binding
   facility."

Nico
--