Re: [TLS] TLS Cached Info Status

Hannes,

Did you ever get any of the telemetry data?  If not what is plan b?

I'd like to see this draft progress soon, assuming there's wg support 
for it, or to officially have it declared dead.

spt

On 5/14/13 7:18 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Hi all,
> I thought it would be a good idea to let the group know what the status
> of the TLS Cached Info draft is (since Rob just asked me a few minutes
> ago).
> You may recall that we had a discussion about the ability to not only
> cache a single OCSP response (as defined with RFC 6066) but also OCSP
> responses of intermediate CA certs, which is functionality
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-multiple-cert-status-extension/ provides.
> Rob raised this issue in his review, see
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg09352.html.
> To me it sounds reasonable to add the requested functionality and the
> pros & cons had been discussed on the list.
> When I met Ekr at the recent NIST workshop we briefly spoke about the
> TLS Cached Info document and how to progress it. He came up with the
> idea to use the Firefox telemetry feature to gather some data so that we
> can estimage the cache hit/miss ratio. With data we would obviously be
> in a much better position to make an informed decision.
> I hope that we get that data soon. If we cannot get it then we have to
> switch to plan B.
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>