Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01.txt

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 23 October 2014 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246EC1AD445 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQjOuBq4Hks3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [72.246.2.115]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68F81AD430 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC13D475D8; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:49:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com [172.17.121.112]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D049F475D4; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:49:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas3.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-relay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC458004E; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:49:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-CASHUB4.kendall.corp.akamai.com (172.27.105.20) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:49:53 -0400
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([169.254.1.71]) by USMA1EX-CASHUB4.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.20]) with mapi; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:49:52 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:49:51 -0400
Thread-Topic: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01.txt
Thread-Index: Ac/uTJLy+zY7fKesT6G9N8RBc5B1XgAtPy8w
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71D3AF651E4@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CAO7N=i3gC=+qcgHU=aMKtRyT7tZV5fm=9gJii-=yOpcNECOEvA@mail.gmail.com> <20141022175238.GF19158@mournblade.imrryr.org> <544837FD.202@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <544837FD.202@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/GQ25lu1_KrSKecdeJF6479C5Rc0
Subject: Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01.txt
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:49:56 -0000

> I think there is a significant difference between the security (in particular
> confidentiality) one gets with good and dodgy algorithms which is sufficient
> to argue that the OS design pattern is inappropriate to use with such dodgy
> algs.

I'm having trouble parsing things.  You don't mean "both good and dodgy," but rather "good compared with dodgy" or "good contrasted with dodgy"

Sorry, you IE folks are just too good with words for a poor old yank like me :) 

--  
Principal Security Engineer, Akamai Technologies
IM: rsalz@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz