Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Fri, 28 April 2017 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFAB129444 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQugiHLsi8Qg for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com (mail-it0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E37B9129478 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 70so50050768ita.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=eUCApvWIME2Vl3tiNB9FaKMA+2dWrblGPmMN2KfG1vk=; b=LSsyjw/0tGB5gSKyC/aRi4W0ieqpdRug8Wwn7g3ed8Gr71aC7QG0SPthnE6FVeSBuM 7BTlinRwsiYsaesNyTk4BP7T6q3J3dCwr2YOV1i2oXL1nOv7SiIr3uLtdyDM/okUcb+M A5j69c+/p1gsKLlw89ppxmUN7NfsSjBoOrJFs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=eUCApvWIME2Vl3tiNB9FaKMA+2dWrblGPmMN2KfG1vk=; b=pIl5Zbm6xMQ/T7cC2nrCPgtOsbS4LKYgVd1i6XHrxE3CpXrYuDaTbyhEp8y3be+482 VX3KlODsJpIPesN+/sq5OyQ6NivTzI4KonYTW2NfSx5quNRuwuHQbVhWdkKYLz7bbjlq Oea6ZgNvu8ZFwJParvHdS6nZuIiTlmotdVXY8XhODJPlBThj6Dh+u/e9ky77fYD5y6CD xWxhBK4zoeO1VzbC4NqtppMm7aH+3rgtc6DUckkg1vnJevpuq0wXuO8Ub00Pqf5NN+Hn 7LzEY+b8K2FvYMI2zqAyGTKs/npXiVIimFlbDzYtHzP1vgmdQojuqEPPFSdFu/xI/8LE haWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4dxcXAR/HQDzqry9lHuT5Gwy6QvR14bfH3ZI+dPCiLPrJ/EoRi IS5YwFOfQCLwkG615NY=
X-Received: by 10.36.46.193 with SMTP id i184mr3909958ita.51.1493414521953; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [5.5.33.51] (vpn.snozzages.com. [204.42.252.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a68sm324056itd.30.2017.04.28.14.22.00 for <tls@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:21:56 -0400
References: <F7262846-0E93-4780-B051-8DB1253ADCE5@sn3rd.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <F7262846-0E93-4780-B051-8DB1253ADCE5@sn3rd.com>
Message-Id: <AA91E23D-3C27-42BA-BD6F-5F192AE4FADE@sn3rd.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Gp1lOsRhQZ2-yD2BcwkhI_FCYHY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 21:23:57 -0000

Thanks to MT and Ben for their reviews.  Joe and I have asked Kathleen to progress this draft towards the “approved” state.

spt

> On Apr 11, 2017, at 09:09, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis has been revised since it left the WG and we agree with Yoav’s statement at the mic in Chicago that the WG should review the changes before we ask Kathleen (our newly appointed AD) to continue progressing the draft.  Please review the differences from the -12 version that went through WGLC and the latest version [0] and let us know by 20170426 whether there is anything that would stop progression of the draft.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> J&S
> 
> [0] https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-12&url2=draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-16