Re: [TLS] WG adoption + early code point assignment: draft-mavrogiannopoulos-chacha-tls

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 20 May 2015 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5809B1A8840 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 08:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WuKMEwkNI1x6 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 May 2015 08:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCB9A1A883F for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 08:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicmx19 with SMTP id mx19so159485580wic.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 May 2015 08:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=SULuD1nFC+4BhaXE/4MqkQiF10kOs5JhIWDKfr9AQQk=; b=fd1j0Yx3TV8VwboGq9CY7zcSHEyHs20V50igIaCAzN1+35AEHq+xeQmVpPOYGo1VI5 rfKTz6z90arj0/siL723K4W85s2X4n7OvuibpT4+JwazzmnHKkA9pvELYUlc7WBK6Yx+ KypiyytwhC1OX+XMjvVkaxCDu23SftRHL7CIkQU1VYy6IOllfvDarwrwI6jOnFuScu25 Rawv1GZWGRieayJ7FMUy1xstsw6U9ommP4YFOF9fLaAIUZLtoHkg7okcNHrpwF9q33/D GPH7dVTkS1FjIIOV28AntPEUHx/o0FMM209CC0Sjb0fZsFH8ekkfeMKlJZQVL9+2jtBi qFtg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmPRra24t4bIrX8wPbpt6I4kPiwu3GY2yZSMQd2EWJrWyi5JfE7HrLjt7T6V0yQr7zTt3NM
X-Received: by 10.180.212.106 with SMTP id nj10mr43542678wic.53.1432136163621; Wed, 20 May 2015 08:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.205.87 with HTTP; Wed, 20 May 2015 08:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMfhd9X6eKLw7Y9kQmrp9XQiMin2pS=npWdxcXsdK78zGgxvxQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <FD8B7C3F-C3DD-4367-B84D-26B9907F1B9D@ieca.com> <CABcZeBOqnyXS5kp=ZiN2PpKYt_dOg1+L4_S__h-+YP=n6sHk3A@mail.gmail.com> <1269593170.1072986.1432104184832.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <CABcZeBNQQKgBzzoia0TWzbG8PycoOLT+ejOM7dwNNfgNoCqRtA@mail.gmail.com> <86AF5010-12A3-410A-AE23-9A0643D536EE@gmail.com> <CAMfhd9XvrhX3MgjMOQ+P=c8oydWT6F6AwUfFerbSWLgra2tbdw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMB9ieZ2n4maCkJXAWKEto81XDEfFDnjY=X1G3fKNwjcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMfhd9X6eKLw7Y9kQmrp9XQiMin2pS=npWdxcXsdK78zGgxvxQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 08:35:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNm4fYRQE+6-L9CF-x9hhwFQ4oZDDMTv4T9QURSzR7Jyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c329484d901b0516852f6b
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Gvraqrro1riVwoTxaDsWTDYwJwc>
Cc: IETF TLS Working Group <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption + early code point assignment: draft-mavrogiannopoulos-chacha-tls
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:36:06 -0000

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>;
wrote:

> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>; wrote:
> > What would you think of just adopting the 1.3 approach then?
>
> Sure. Although I half suspect


half suspect? optimist!


that the final TLS might change again
> and we would still end up with three modes :) But that's not a big
> deal.


It will mean that we need a different set of code points than the current
ones, right?

-Ekr


>
> Cheers
>
> AGL
>
> --
> Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org https://www.imperialviolet.org
>