IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] ECH test server

"Chris Box (BT)" <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA29B3A08C0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 03:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w_8R0A57wZIr for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 03:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FE23A0879 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 03:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id r8so3123255qtp.13 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 03:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=l26iRLAlVKVW591/+oMae+b8sCt56V0GXK3xebbviao=; b=KdYdPrvve6FXV0DN4xAlEJiDaYHmMf9j5HjGNULEEXcZU5bhedu6MVf+0cbozgbxPl ozSKOIZRj+1v9aW9LtbluEOyF93QArSSXTAOCAM7pH4ENmKLX5rIM4aMQvecutWY/qir C9fmLRW9bAgRfRozvHpbZln0BTf9Q8l3ZRShkptUGV6zItNVhy13DWZen/hdU2ASRxpI rzgATnP9A7gvuOiQdP1CW0cUqIHaqikXmMmpR16z9Fs8hztsG0Cf40IYxYmlA12f7BFU QSJACku0aL1i41iNDKBQt6CuNjtIc1q+OR31sVamnAYaS2iYOFcG9NAUdg29133X3q8U Oq3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l26iRLAlVKVW591/+oMae+b8sCt56V0GXK3xebbviao=; b=KlGtFWyw5QQ0h43CD9tKOMVnf7u81piLKw6c6AK8RT8LhgzSo5P0VmqOcyFYVZrf9S XJyNL4Q6zDo/tUHpzQmPa4qclvGCprv2d5HN97kV2EajNQZ/YFrOdlRifOpkuVeTFEJ3 wEG2FLr6S0as+DGnlW5ruViirshWbJD4WFdU/K+JVkt+cLwEgNBGlojegbuoIT6p6fOE 1xRc8qW4C977PKJnW/AeiVaR2/ML2AMLVGldv/D1y6bl3s0Uz+FqjgGLfpHvMgR9Ogob b+R84XOpvMDfsmaXomg54gvxeyeBx4X9qnyR/0XgvIwQWlBf9zEKp92kCwaD4cCiOPZR yQ9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dQMYQ5nQQVhnWpRNrJ/Fz6jS3ZMG+SVnDLJXKJdV/NfJBgjMT /ssrP1Xhkwc90t4yy1lmGHC8vVEIUTyErhf+ToDMIMzP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5vFai4s/qrqFW16GBreVfIH17CNhCaGF9G7HycBN4YbLKQQnGsbgE1MNQA6wheVdhLxomkxeKoq/tfCDWJW0=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2972:: with SMTP id z47mr6440916qtz.367.1603881563419; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 03:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACJ6M17Mskq5sdmAo2ddPAR5q_yARVCr6xH0uxpUZLdzdwQ9HA@mail.gmail.com> <8db3dc61-3405-fdd0-d8b3-72fbe9e98ab5@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <8db3dc61-3405-fdd0-d8b3-72fbe9e98ab5@cs.tcd.ie>
From: "Chris Box (BT)" <chris.box.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:39:12 +0000
Message-ID: <CACJ6M17v=f9=WBjjc6nuQBLi6VxTaO-qwxcEMj-ePXvYBhqqXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d9751305b2b8c6cd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/HLSIFJWKXdOFM_6jqcQS1Q7zwGA>
Subject: Re: [TLS] ECH test server
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:39:26 -0000

Ok, so in summary (based on the other thread), I think there is no public
test server yet. And there won't be until the recent rate of change is seen
to slow and implementations have had a chance to catch up.

ECH is a useful privacy enhancement but I'm particularly interested in the
way HTTPS RRs are managed, and consumed by clients.

Chris

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 20:33, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
>
> On 27/10/2020 18:37, Chris Box (BT) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to test an ECH-enabled client, but am struggling to find a
> > public test server with a published ECHconfig in its HTTPS record.
> >
> > Do any yet exist?
> >
> > I've looked in all these places, but none are mentioned:
> > https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/wiki/Implementation-Status
> > https://github.com/tlswg/tlswg-wiki/blob/master/IMPLEMENTATIONS.md
> > https://github.com/tlswg/tlswg-wiki/blob/master/TESTING.md
> >
> > Or is everyone just spinning up private servers for now?
>
> I got as far as draft-05 before falling behind sorry.
> Will post when/if I get current.
>
> See my other mail for the related whine:-)
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > TLS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> >
>

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email