Re: [TLS] Update on TLS 1.3 Middlebox Issues

Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> Sat, 07 October 2017 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <noloader@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF163134931 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vO-nz3esNis2 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8BEC13492C for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f3so33795575oia.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 08:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=6ORM95akjaCNEWSJn9aCNCZYK2e+3Hg1Rer/5rziWl8=; b=Xi92fwpNCdXLOYksc6swD4+H40Ax5wjtFI1nB2Xfxe0ciCJ1mZVc+ZYYtnvCVcree8 LcqzUUfhlIDzFjbG8zNtBYGDg447kc7RwbWy4EVezqX6KpM9oUu9j8hlVPYrIH5qQ1AN FQP5xXIFdel2Bw7mPrhbEQd02PKPvfli+dbVLaIfGMTJIBx27xz63SZ5ZUfxEikhvjX0 wWs+kALdXU0cxq4s5etjpFRRQAXRD49rViUwS+C+jwvYjbZh1rjSNgl96nE/TsZ+7oSy Ruo8BN0DftAg/ii0is7eoRaqYj6RWpGV+IU3Ak2b47lUm/FTup6AP0k4Q5kObKU6j1E8 q8vA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6ORM95akjaCNEWSJn9aCNCZYK2e+3Hg1Rer/5rziWl8=; b=C7BkBPF/PTLR4ZMENp7bIVACtggHRnqq8HmG8ETv/VnNRPpCmYTQVyJhgBgSUmlrmT l0S/+3nTZ4W6IXdzNeBIQqQNAGYdNofBlSUFPPPvMZ6IM0JincrFJemqB6B9L2wGhT1x pmGNd8iI4QYgWLsBWPCz53BpbCxOGcNwP8kh9SddfcRRGcdQF2svm4Jumj4dQRKGYuOY 2Z0UJovM6Ooy2vf4S8A1oo2JNe1vXVmlhz3C5lLbYj2ey9hQVB2r//38fPv3vkHNUOPQ PZqatFXXkJyvSthZNQW6CqTjwFHJ6fXJo3G5+d1NM3MX1vcDD5o70acXVKYx63rfdGvY hdOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXYlb9Nr8bii/bau6TfwRF7ZFp+nmNt/jHzaoEHVqXPrr0+lINJ i/fo8wim4Vh6l2FRYiSfpl8kZM7IX8qBYsk83RU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QB0Q4J5pVbglpUbEX9Y2Tirt4TUNXWutsbai0PKDEFP00tzDgyhA0Vg7LMXhCWmC+TvQo8d2ldYGCqkAVr7Mw8=
X-Received: by 10.202.71.151 with SMTP id u145mr2623690oia.133.1507390414352; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 08:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.19.199 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: noloader@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <C7396C83-9F02-4BF8-B490-4EA8DB9798B1@akamai.com>
References: <CABcZeBMoW8B78C5UmLqAim4X=jQ8jVRYTP-L7RVnU3AScdFvFw@mail.gmail.com> <EAD84CE1-41A9-40FE-B882-18F077FFD691@akamai.com> <17791E16-1E12-4E8E-A098-31E961C2B2CB@gmail.com> <CAOjisRx9rwtbwBOTB+PegrKim2Q3bDmwbZi6KAu0aFMEaYSxRw@mail.gmail.com> <A6896A64-A0B3-409A-ABC2-1EF1D7DD0E7D@akamai.com> <CAL02cgQc2UriU7EZzpYpdxMrj15fDrfsD3adS0TeqhTe8ZEcBA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBP9sqG6sHEdN1hLj4_gT7qQM9vAnhGussrUwkaFO+gciA@mail.gmail.com> <C7396C83-9F02-4BF8-B490-4EA8DB9798B1@akamai.com>
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 11:33:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8=cPGZy20G=mw=5qZ4Y0FmYXtLq0v_FXoVxsFFWpu18Mg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/HMjOdLQ1-nh378U4MsUGgBNOLn4>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Update on TLS 1.3 Middlebox Issues
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 15:33:37 -0000

On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>; wrote:
>
>
>> I suggest we not have this debate now. We'll have a lot more data towards
>> the end of the month and we can have an informed discussion then.
>

> That is what I am asking for.  More information so that the entire WG can
> make an informed decision.  And I was only laying out an option that does
> not seem to have been considered before.

The group (or the IETF) might also consider a policy to answer Ilari
Liusvaara's question, "What you think is acceptable failure rate?"

That is a governance issue. It should probably be [nearly] written in
stone and applied equally to all problems and decisions.

As an example, the US's IRS used to have a policy to support any
browser with 3% market share or more. I don't know what it is
nowadays.

Jeff