Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 - method to request uncached shared secrets

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 18 July 2015 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DF01A1A70 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.462
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.462 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LHeTTTBIrNzl for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (unknown [23.79.238.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DBC1A065C for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE184C5D7; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:22:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com [172.17.120.126]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C976F4C5D6; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:22:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1437243744; bh=jLuv+XNTPxPhwq65eUPCTzYmRpXP4r5wqoEjk6Q0qck=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XLnrL4pqIs3S3wisxq/m/LwkH51W9A5pTqVli+Lv7LFUqTHC/4aysvYHz0wLUi8MC AYyNk/8/bQXSmQcCIA5ahXRhPmvoxIEecKqG7eUvaDVxXav82qKs067DfUBYOdcxr1 gAOlxfjuH993vHGxirqbrm3IQcfHHRv9Let4WQE0=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (ustx2ex-cas4.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.25.33]) by prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5615A205F; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:21:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.102) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 13:21:50 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.132]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.132]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 13:21:50 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, Dave Garrett <davemgarrett@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] TLS 1.3 - method to request uncached shared secrets
Thread-Index: AQHQwReJ7GOXOEU4BEqb1+g/MGuaCZ3hiuxQ
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:21:49 +0000
Message-ID: <c91664bb0cb24b3da95662dc5bb9095a@ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <201507180037.56413.davemgarrett@gmail.com> <CAFewVt72efH+9qYzCSBh1heM7N9Ki-6VrVxbAc0=4UcSf5XbVg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFewVt72efH+9qYzCSBh1heM7N9Ki-6VrVxbAc0=4UcSf5XbVg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.152.167]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Hrv9fmYlxrMgGc4MuDYKunomkwo>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS 1.3 - method to request uncached shared secrets
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:21:55 -0000

Brian's description makes much more sense to me than Dave's suggestion.  I'd +1 the former and -1 the latter.