IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: Adoption call for TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term Support

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Wed, 06 November 2024 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF4EC14F5F4 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 01:16:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dukhovni.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T6TmPZFT7JvF for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 01:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chardros.imrryr.org (chardros.imrryr.org [144.6.86.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7E47C1DC819 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 01:16:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dukhovni.org; i=@dukhovni.org; q=dns/txt; s=f8320d6e; t=1730884598; h=date : from : to : subject : message-id : reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to : from; bh=m6PF+GiCwUjXlkImxh0zBcwNXZozCIFddW4bthKifVc=; b=FOqUBgTXHp0/+BntQoYIL3iSaBFdRsbzfq3kQUNysV5ddYw472T1sEFO5uR3ltIvYzZqS CBTK1YibALxS1fSItMRONXqpFWqfn4An+WaNDpflgcg43h4GLJpHBs4wsFfSU99P+Hi1fVo 2Un7+qjJjWhhDpJLUurDOGvOjqFe/W4=
Received: by chardros.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2482492B6F8; Wed, 06 Nov 2024 20:16:38 +1100 (AEDT)
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 20:16:38 +1100
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Zysz9ikave6fQBoB@chardros.imrryr.org>
References: <278163DF-0CB8-472F-84CB-0B8236FEC7C1@sn3rd.com> <231D5F24-E1AE-4F7C-9860-F6B0FF79D6FF@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <231D5F24-E1AE-4F7C-9860-F6B0FF79D6FF@akamai.com>
Mail-Followup-To: <tls@ietf.org>
Message-ID-Hash: FERGOPQVHIBPNOWHNWREXVMKYZJX2MNH
X-Message-ID-Hash: FERGOPQVHIBPNOWHNWREXVMKYZJX2MNH
X-MailFrom: ietf-dane@dukhovni.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tls@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] Re: Adoption call for TLS 1.2 Update for Long-term Support
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/I--Z6jAKr-pBVwYr5WrvsQulb8I>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 07:01:13PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:

> I strongly support adoption.
> 
> I do not understand why anyone would be opposed to the IETF making
> deployment recommendations. I can understand why someone might be
> bothered by the impliciation that *THIS ONE WAY* is the only way to
> get long-term support, especially if it's seen to contradict our
> encouragement of TLS 1.3. But that is an editorial issue that can be
> easily fixed.
> 
> I would like to see this adopted, a short change cycle, and then
> advanced in the same cluster with our TLS 1.2 is frozen document.

I support adoption.

-- 
    Viktor.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status