Re: [TLS] RFC5746: Renegotiation Indication for minimal servers

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 31 August 2016 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DFC12D179 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QZyU0K7tAexB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:40:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EDC912D54D for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id v123so54565874qkh.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:21:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=R0mwvGHznfYNaeJcNnplJ2itGGicltf5vg457RnNfq4=; b=M8WwwOiOV+8bawLIk5QIoFhZ+0TEqUMLX3IU0SiabPC94QcbfY4NMk/FXWgJnac7iR l7WmmqWMaU3XOiaWeNkUJvmvLQAurupKbyyirV+osP0lWJtStUO3Gy70qN9r58blb5DP C0I/5z9w6e91BrRn+OIghyv1b4R4HVvCw2HkrZn/GdGFLx+KGd8SZ7r9Ll9r6tC6PbHz QIUP3BiOCS09cmssYjidLDzKIeRoCycsp606H5HtH1Moz+dH7l7w63I7tqfVlyVPL/e6 5GWFYb2FYFRwHAexJycDjjienbCMFBzvOw74tdFBYye9dPn8uaTtzrBeSkgcQf1w3eAq BTmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R0mwvGHznfYNaeJcNnplJ2itGGicltf5vg457RnNfq4=; b=STqEyYu3XIiibIbMbn5ZtPYRsX7VBB7oQqEKOBQamhX678iwOEmoLWniCD0W6ZYhvr raUW4t3n0CAtieigt5/hutveJHDqjlmtLOZC8tGrqlCDtnkWtJcVtJwc2sBz8sQzyyfR LELTWXbuKXd6AxhL49EKDQXX/wjJCmHNhgAQI56oynRcBZfG4N9o0zG6CNPXU9cgIiaC WvKj7HboVPMaWbM3jGlF7NPMoRIhO1Gbe/DXH51wSuaAKV5QzNDiWh43H8xex0QQu2Zo 7TS2krQIzy2kXhnYbta7Jpfy+LOleBpSFqiaS8TZk/ISDdSTRqhLC8t4+S2V+CtqEO70 BNZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOT/aEWo7gd9Eyi3zViVWVI6491XMH00Ns+KOzYAyeStzhW2Dtg3uuUd6eK8XP8kz4ZhWOI3vpRrJFIAw==
X-Received: by 10.55.11.131 with SMTP id 125mr10856299qkl.169.1472656913853; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.22.146 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <52BDE689-120E-4F95-98B9-1D83B1097B2B@sn3rd.com>
References: <9edc2222b4e141538875ff62ca3be22e@FE-MBX1015.de.bosch.com> <CACsn0c=GN_f1UhoyzbRATgn_+C-0nK_aqx_MSaY2PnSuKeXcog@mail.gmail.com> <1470148363699.24362@bosch.com> <4ff68fa1-0d8e-ed1e-064c-8bb5bbf5935a@akamai.com> <1470232754152.68803@bosch.com> <52BDE689-120E-4F95-98B9-1D83B1097B2B@sn3rd.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 01:21:53 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV8NkTv6WOQ-MQmHF-7EVnRhdN21rQ1vje=0yyN++PzfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/I2xKL_1KXIVz5SA9D26inKw6fyc>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] RFC5746: Renegotiation Indication for minimal servers
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 15:40:39 -0000

On 26 August 2016 at 06:43, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> Any more thoughts on these?

I have no problem with implementations that don't use R-I (in either
extension or SCSV form) if they don't intend to ever renegotiate.  I
know that that disagrees with RFC 5746, but there you have it.