Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted

nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com> Tue, 13 March 2018 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B4A12DA0D for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=e-dco-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JJoGVzyhNYq4 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com (mail-io0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 729D212741D for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id m22so996761iob.12 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=e-dco-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qsm99IS1WrQfLiCxYeRlOJ5sCcTd29/qHDA+y0hh+D4=; b=DCpuHSdgMsa59UjxpNXXHpkL4DcnKsJVRn0hjpU+qMz2rCMGDm1qtxE+ie36boA840 WBx23hyUTfRPIoOMUrgHUAtpnCkO3Ekuf1imTOWkm7UJew+i9gF8CSLXZzvBprFb31Jo ZcLysyDgeO5puFDNacrlifu26R5GxgjAhk86blUonkI1gNza4Ad1Z9CQ63u3PCABEhhR dNMKdvCcdKcb4hrvmBWUjcSdOXuXafVs++YawpTDU/PFgSmx/E1QUZzxBxZNyfcRSKyz lm87IC2x49gk8NnSORBoY2eoiphapHqsUnT0Rat5P1HXefKsQ8SCNC+5xHImDeLdvDZV 5szA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qsm99IS1WrQfLiCxYeRlOJ5sCcTd29/qHDA+y0hh+D4=; b=WEngtIoIKj7XeKkPwbxglP7fQwBBG6tWLhXb8sa09ponKkZYrlbOzcJcKLZ9WJ2fw1 mxmxoG8S0HfvA3jyb9B/rf/BHQKJ17ECELqWgDWo50/3ijztCINlMa/TyOFJvWhgU+RI KSAYVf9ZRLPEw7ZfZN/uDb3DsVTDmaUZUWkk2K6COw/h/uM2DjVz70yTlTwgV8HvKcBi rz7MKEV2OfCoIPL+bMahRtztnRuZtQoHl4YuOAtYSQBUb+AC/6udKYLjFHhGKE/MYzE7 umZfjv8kCV4shSrZdmmUClFClAY6A+TW54u0juhv3Fhm0Y95xjN5Urgd1A1G2PAMGDyj vt7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Fan8HBW+VSj7ppMOpjwi8C97fpKWOYR7H01ZC3UuwNsMLL6Ymu LAwDvugCaQf+wWFf8y6yThrlgop7yP9duB/zmtDt2Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELv2kVeSh1NpbYr2XZnTUDjZPgwgOI11QEDAtgYnuyZj903uVJW66T5WRBZsmQQqPKzUbsZYPIG8v4u4su+ja1A=
X-Received: by 10.107.33.72 with SMTP id h69mr1558538ioh.209.1520961897662; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.29.138 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgQVait=px0sQ73D3pxYuyhdRi_depwp0mrjvot3opECLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6140B7A6-A1C7-44BC-9C65-9BE0D5E1B580@sn3rd.com> <986797a7-81b0-7874-5f39-afe83c86635b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAOgPGoBYc7O+qmjM-ptkRkE6mRsOYgc5O7Wu9pm3drFp3TVa6Q@mail.gmail.com> <d7dfdc1a-2c96-fd88-df1b-3167fe0f804b@cs.tcd.ie> <CAHbuEH7E8MhFcMt2GSngSrGxN=6bU6LD49foPC-mdoUZboH_0Q@mail.gmail.com> <1a024320-c674-6f75-ccc4-d27b75e3d017@nomountain.net> <2ed0gc.p5dcxd.31eoyz-qmf@mercury.scss.tcd.ie> <d7ec110f-2a0b-cf97-94a3-eeb5594d8c24@cs.tcd.ie> <CAAF6GDcaG7nousyQ6wotEg4dW8PFuXi=riH2702eZZn2fwfLQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPsNn2XCNtqZaQM6Bg8uoMZRJE+qQakEwvw8Cn9fBm-5H+Xn_A@mail.gmail.com> <3F8142DE-EADB-4AB9-A204-7D87ACDCD3E3@akamai.com> <CAPsNn2VE_7+rWT0fp9rrVnZrgcY7ORLWTee+kf_Av1dqm4CiDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CB55AABB-8937-4F6B-B5AC-B6F262F08A4F@akamai.com> <CAPsNn2U_xG28Tumo3oRkQ+6=BHzgv-6YtgNSpwvhdFFRWc7EQQ@mail.gmail.com> <60905506-354D-4A12-80EB-984029385F7F@akamai.com> <CAPsNn2WNs7OoYToUJ7J1-aKKpxvV5ms8HbuOcF6KCpQpgaz8RQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQVait=px0sQ73D3pxYuyhdRi_depwp0mrjvot3opECLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 10:24:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPsNn2VMw2HmOGX1BfXTanOkg34OSRorYY8FB=qpsbOfkaeGeA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140f5e6a0a18505674e8977"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/I4R4xIGHT_vv8ZdTtKiTWnS4BdU>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS@IETF101 Agenda Posted
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 17:25:03 -0000

 >It would be far better if the concerned organizations could come forth
directly.  That helps the community see that there are real people who care
enough about this to engage, and will hopefully allow more direct
discussions of >the problems and possible solutions.

>Kudos to the US Bank guys for leading the way here.

There will be at least 10 other concerned organizations in London.   More
attending remotely.

I am happy to set up an informal session where all can meet and talk
quietly.   Not everyone will be there on Sunday but maybe Monday breakfast
or during a break?  Just let me know if you are interested & we can make
intros.

Nalini


On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>; wrote:

> It would be far better if the concerned organizations could come forth
> directly.  That helps the community see that there are real people who care
> enough about this to engage, and will hopefully allow more direct
> discussions of the problems and possible solutions.
>
> Kudos to the US Bank guys for leading the way here.
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:13 PM, nalini elkins <nalini.elkins@e-dco.com>;
> wrote:
>
>>
>>    - >>"We" is a consortium of organizations.   I would say over 50 so
>>    far.  They operate large data centers.   They are in manufacturing,
>>    insurance, finance, and others.
>>
>>
>> > See, I have a bit of a problem with that.  As you should know (since
>> you are a Mentor coordinator), participation is on the basis of
>> individuals, not corporations or consortia.  Right?
>>
>>
>> Sure.  I see your point.  From now on, I will stop using the pronoun "we"
>> and say "I".  Is that better?   And others can speak for themselves also.
>>
>>
>> Nalini
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>; wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>    - "We" is a consortium of organizations.   I would say over 50 so
>>>    far.  They operate large data centers.   They are in manufacturing,
>>>    insurance, finance, and others.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> See, I have a bit of a problem with that.  As you should know (since you
>>> are a Mentor coordinator), participation is on the basis of individuals,
>>> not corporations or consortia.  Right?
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Nalini Elkins
>> President
>> Enterprise Data Center Operators
>> www.e-dco.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>
>>
>


-- 
Thanks,
Nalini Elkins
President
Enterprise Data Center Operators
www.e-dco.com