RE: [TLS] Re: Cipher-suite specific extensions

["Simon Blake-Wilson" <[e-mail]>]

Hi folks,

By my count the results of my informal poll on whether people support
adding cipher-suite specific extensions to the TLS extensions and ECC in
TLS docs are currently 1-1.

I don't think that shows sufficient support for making the changes to add
cipher-suite specific support so unless more people speak up I suggest we
move forward with the two documents without cipher-suite specific
extension support.

Note that this certainly does not exclude someone putting out a new I-D
specifying syntax for cipher-suite specific extensions to use to populate
extension data, as well as new extension types for cipher-suite specific
versions of existing extensions and/or new cipher-suite specific
extensions.

Any comments?

Best regards. Simon 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] 
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Hovav Shacham
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 8:25 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [TLS] Re: Cipher-suite specific extensions
> 
> 
> "Simon Blake-Wilson" <[e-mail]> writes:
> 
> > Can I take this as meaning that not many people care and we 
> can move 
> > forward with the TLS extensions and ECC documents as they are, 
> > deferring this issue to future I-Ds?
> 
> Yes.  I support leaving the extensions document as is, 
> without adding ciphersuite-specific extension support.
> 
> -- 
> Hovav Shacham                                  [e-mail]
> "Rightly looked at there is no laughable thing under the sun."
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> 

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls