IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 14 May 2025 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B961A288B62A for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 May 2025 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id luQVfZwZ8Hcp for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 May 2025 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A437288B625 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 May 2025 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356631A151D; Wed, 14 May 2025 12:23:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F17811A2D67; Wed, 14 May 2025 12:23:03 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.500.181.1.5\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <33F8C70F-154C-41B5-AAA0-ABE220363F5C@thomwiggers.nl>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 12:22:53 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <972285E6-1781-4E86-B8BF-74FE113D53E0@vigilsec.com>
References: <CAOgPGoCdGaQhb2Pw=zJ4F04V7kA6d5xwk5Ja55zhBfwHpmPxLQ@mail.gmail.com> <33F8C70F-154C-41B5-AAA0-ABE220363F5C@thomwiggers.nl>
To: Thom Wiggers <thom@thomwiggers.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.500.181.1.5)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=pair-202402141609; bh=Uio8bn9+JZ+csjzEhRS8axDPYffwj2wjjOxnXa+OqO4=; b=pVHHL4lVuB5FzwLwdbvYaVL8YXGeClIQ9JihnLnLr/s7Ja7E5FRePNboZkTKnnAXe2cAovxrhwH5Wu9BpWUAfDy1HF0eDL1zRiIRqjwQY4Lgoo9diH+ReuJsadbK8VN2wTijabtEUvWKivh1BzpEhytqvP1dhEbC1/ag2hvXHO2+pIaMhdMY50/s8v1bxXDku6mqhtIcXJ1Oi8bFl/nC+2rk8ymMbOjvOylpFXCpRV59xuKyC0+POA5mORTTqwKx3C5hxiUnGoNwXZgUxDwyyTTRbzwPr+tnNwvdHaz1aqjGVnt5h0jXvOFzrkDIDwUwzXOKM3bg8uFPTejeubFARQ==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 66.39.134.11
Message-ID-Hash: BBBJBX4JXKW2QN52L7MV3OOD3QWW4AS2
X-Message-ID-Hash: BBBJBX4JXKW2QN52L7MV3OOD3QWW4AS2
X-MailFrom: housley@vigilsec.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: Working Group Last Call for RFC8773bis
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/IBTzBi_3WR1MICBZD-N4gOXz-_E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

Thom:

> I think this looks good.

Thanks for the careful read.

> Small typo: 
> > "Of course, this places significant burden on the generation ane of external PSKs.” 

Fixed in my edit buffer.

> ane -> and

Fixed.

> Another nit:
> 
> > due to the break in the (EC)DH algorithm
> 
> Is this a break of the algorithm or a break in the algorithm?

Good catch. Changed to "break of the (EC)DH algorithm".

Russ

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status