Re: [TLS] Computation of static secret in anonymous DH

Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> Fri, 26 June 2015 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE641B304F for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:47:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87UVoPm6ey7S for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi (emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F2F31B3009 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LK-Perkele-VII (a91-155-194-207.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.155.194.207]) by emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3913F9035C; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:47:34 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:47:34 +0300
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Message-ID: <20150626194734.GA31681@LK-Perkele-VII>
References: <2AA11887-2F82-48EF-BD45-4D85CFA83847@qut.edu.au> <20150617082529.GA17280@LK-Perkele-VII> <CABcZeBNzzfxo+xQRrS=7-7C65kr3DqtJ5BHqTnt0mC8v-oFuUw@mail.gmail.com> <20150617150505.GA19959@LK-Perkele-VII> <CABcZeBN8m6f=F14Qx1QctMCoF7_LYNrf9D3HstoTZsK2orS1SA@mail.gmail.com> <20150626085008.GA25187@LK-Perkele-VII> <CADi0yUN0S0_r0Aw-Z9SYTCJd2MCfEO3gq26D4L8ftxV5tEjqJg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOTZaw-pr-bjeAPcbyGCNzQ-OUA1trjFG9zgouNF3PBtw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOTZaw-pr-bjeAPcbyGCNzQ-OUA1trjFG9zgouNF3PBtw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ICSnJZBk44xks_cbWAPgjYAnqwE>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Computation of static secret in anonymous DH
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 19:47:40 -0000

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:31:01PM -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Note: I have updated the WIP (and that's what I sent to Hugo) so it now
> contains the
> changes the values Hugo describes.

Small nit:

master_secret= HKDF(xSS, xES, "master secret")
 
Should that be:

master_secret= HKDF(xSS, xES, "master secret", L)

(the length parameter is seemingly missing)?


Also, is that label NUL-terminated or not (I think it is)? Another
reason why I think it is not a good idea to use notes to change
meaning of explcit algorithms...



-Ilari