Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 04 June 2020 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202573A03ED for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 08:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UaPTSvfBvO2f for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 08:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E31E23A03EA for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 08:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5599C300B6B for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:46:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 9pjXjY6KKeJ2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:46:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (pool-72-66-113-56.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.113.56]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5474300670; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:46:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <F3357894-3045-44A9-B30E-8AD2DEB37DE6@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1BC4B06A-FFD3-4380-BC2B-88150FAA86D8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 11:46:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMswqW4rWGmTxwK_zUy0-anRt6PFPo_YK1zNhWQw7wtSg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
References: <20200604000011.387A5F4070F@rfc-editor.org> <73b5d3e2-d2f4-447c-84d6-0ae0a08374a9@www.fastmail.com> <CABcZeBMswqW4rWGmTxwK_zUy0-anRt6PFPo_YK1zNhWQw7wtSg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/IKGfbtcvbjr6AzyIwuU7zlYki3E>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 15:46:41 -0000

Eric:

> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 6:07 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net <mailto:mt@lowentropy.net>> wrote:
> I think that this is a useful erratum and it should be approved/HFDU.  The extension to which this text alludes is RFC 8773, not post_handshake_auth.
> 
> Yes, although 8773 actually is not super-clear about post-handshake, so that's actually something we should clarify there.

RFC 8773 is not intended for post handshake.  So, I never thought about that.  What is the use case you are considering?

Russ