Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key
Karthikeyan Bhargavan <karthik.bhargavan@gmail.com> Sun, 19 October 2014 09:58 UTC
Return-Path: <karthik.bhargavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D8C1A00E1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AOf5ab6JTe4p for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24BAB1A00B0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id em10so4967437wid.4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=yjn+XqFsssQ5C3Ch9/KUZvNKlQNM+n2zu6rw595H1no=; b=YRb0i5Sq/wn/XkkOo0xKK/WNP3ZFA7xofuMjKLQpdhjAVF23Mt6jZxZ2hsbkdJQo3M HjvtbsUFauEB0QF2dzrSxC7NPzfN94jD2lfAGVb6rMh5TJpHepZnAWiIzS/1xT/LuYLU 9sjFuuB7ZJsP28I0Us2NUWWEvrrpruUB81i2KVdldt7H8LgV1HkEmA1ZjeXeuwBf0WAo 5P6nLHJQcFHcp5UhkMbziOQc4m1t7iVwgZa450s3rveggz8zHT1uVgWviXIyZe5Jyjm0 qVrjFW7VYHyv7+AU6/uc6saZn5wEYYNGyQ3FEylIppJMheXJMR9o5S1DLvwlOPpZdBT/ zOMw==
X-Received: by 10.180.86.38 with SMTP id m6mr11433134wiz.65.1413712686765; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (244.92.69.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.69.92.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l17sm1336780wiw.7.2014.10.19.02.58.05 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Karthikeyan Bhargavan <karthik.bhargavan@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Karthikeyan Bhargavan <karthikeyan.bhargavan@inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
In-Reply-To: <20141019081551.GA12098@LK-Perkele-VII>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 11:58:04 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2D0BBEAE-F6D0-4D10-AFC5-5D9885CA48BB@inria.fr>
References: <CABcZeBOdpK_JEH4EwnsoTA8Rje5pS5CtSbFGh8rHQzse92m9Wg@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0cmYs8TMeKcTvqxv1DUGizcp5k7uo86muoqYbGRH4xDQHA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMxw3Oz1U-6GeTAuUJ1bZbBYhRWsQgscrHFLcTHh=_H1g@mail.gmail.com> <94F22FB7-ACA4-407C-8528-E806DFA64F54@inria.fr> <20141019081551.GA12098@LK-Perkele-VII>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/IRHtady-Yfsi2Sk5V9QH0KtUdHI
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:58:10 -0000
> Now, for non-PFS key exchanges, certificates can contain exchange keys. > In practicular, RSA kex server certs do contain exchange key. And > thus under "hash exchange keys", you need to hash it. You’re right, including the peer identity applies mainly for non-PFS exchanges where the peer’s keycard is closely linked to its identity (RSA, PSK, and Fixed DH/ECDH) For DHE/ECDHE, if the client/server negotiate a known good group/curve, agreeing upon the DH params should be enough. Since, by default, the server can choose an arbitrary group, it seems prudent to include its identity.
- [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Karthikeyan Bhargavan
- Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Karthikeyan Bhargavan
- Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Refactoring client auth/re-key Martin Thomson