IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS]Re: Trust Anchor Negotiation Surveillance Concerns and Risks

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Tue, 23 July 2024 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5307FC14F5FE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u6eD8wH9XXK4 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF553C14F5F3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-367963ea053so4180796f8f.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1721758131; x=1722362931; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MCBGmpXkswiGFvdcQCmRYx4hcjp0VyRKdHi5oDjvXsY=; b=AgBQX9m8tTpuKwaR8iHRxNOWMCsBYUkeYTm8F+Rq/ca939q0XwXsdIGqMJtGIsLJgQ WrpZtFJ0lPMFVtUdSg5f489Hv8yDSxVr1EUDdKt3rQgAuB3/q50jFZyasmFmt+X7nB9t n9h50m9E8EFWhmppFFeLYs9/FTtdPdEC4FLOXSmXrNpVrkUp8XXdKB8JPDc/Kbn/NSAS Fc6inqcbts0BeRhpRGYOybesNV4yVV3slP2U3suUZfNtzrmb46HE/lT/bML0Xvudshdn 8C0HQCFsUdLU0xpbpYcZtvGLoJVvWWAPHhhtf2pWkoPiIruAAPDEAebhGzKdHnmxAUZf wnnw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721758131; x=1722362931; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=MCBGmpXkswiGFvdcQCmRYx4hcjp0VyRKdHi5oDjvXsY=; b=FNgufcVXAsWPOpmpLFq3PI0lHmSy5g6FVUMjxkb3JfABXGbmF70mO3FG5MNMPkYUWa 7spLWz+CIltWUs8yYLMEBY+cur8vdOHi3bQ+il/WESnAztZ34hQH3McCXuSw2KSzH2Rb c4erVqa6jMZIOkNU2iOE501fX6ofO4wlCQmdskmNVUBJ8pDrxCneO/mOAdLzN5JKK3Ec DoXm+jlPn+nNEY43Zu77NKe5CWEsQtVN2kAiOTvCzbrA81T+XXeNK9WbvtVunImBsaOI 5eWEIZkTyvrspPp/vJ0Tvbx3DmT3mmJ/MALVXrCBaC5xIlmjBMaX3zTguTwDxFEoxhNu cA2g==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUWSLEI9PkTpzma9zlMHELI+iElP8/Kv1tBPPG5z8uPD2BZlPMbSN51nKrB77Oz4afWisXNw4buCYfxL2c=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz43swaZVcJ0d0KQh7qNdBtJlNEuQxoz+PLABB/vajmUTSsNz0v dow/LL5Ip1RfeSMtlbexseaa+iJvy1CISfw2oEXR5KHgg6GeR66iYB/e7yZEfBDwW/uwdin4gz4 2iOQD9tKn8Qvb5TVmJZn9oNE1XZtPlYrs
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHCYOaAbA+uAz1mCgk3AwE7WKMosAyBi7EqIG8rS5QmCnLhOzK0pw098Ko+6CQv5EwP2F3TaDZOfHP3OnWadBI=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e7c7:0:b0:368:6337:4221 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-369f0a99316mr439111f8f.54.1721758131103; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACsn0cmhsh-zeJOaa7xy_2crxgvhAF=nK9FqWxxf1dB2SMhMyQ@mail.gmail.com> <Zpu0reBpH3dtFYdf@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald> <CADQzZqtsj272Gt771Ef=VhS2+WvWKkct0Jx1=wmyS7kTu0ds1w@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8qwaB3VuWSYTi-gH99+N_cgi1ZAdMpzhrSE4=KTD5xbQMwXA@mail.gmail.com> <CADQzZqtyCQwQR2WPrBdqGGUm_tvZ7Akra5z9vqJ30x9vWBtxew@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8qwaDt-vhUb-E48874QLKe-YOc3xzC4VsArzYf_BGREz0+QQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADQzZqvw0Phv1oa--C6HSZJpKkG899v36g-xXrwyiKpM8cyYJw@mail.gmail.com> <254e0d54-7438-4666-8a0b-1ddf431e65d4@dennis-jackson.uk> <CADQzZqupwoqLbJNEU4RgA+G983_a34g-MmHsJN=XZygjLtDUkw@mail.gmail.com> <5f23bc91-b0a4-4ba4-add8-e920ca9c7784@dennis-jackson.uk> <Zp6y2ImjHI1R0oy6@LK-Perkele-VII2.locald> <5a942952-09e1-4aab-b321-cb05ea9c9528@dennis-jackson.uk> <A4DA0C3B-5ED3-4A2B-8CAE-B0B1ED862F29@akamai.com> <d751b4c1-fef2-4bf8-a6a6-46d4801c8aef@dennis-jackson.uk> <B55CD6CF-8962-4FF9-9849-5A321976FB2D@akamai.com> <d43b40bd-e2b9-494c-ad8f-d8438247e61f@dennis-jackson.uk> <B449D030-EAD8-4467-8920-68DB4BCBA680@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <B449D030-EAD8-4467-8920-68DB4BCBA680@akamai.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:08:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmL8w=tXrQV6k98iaLMtC_srQccnoGKp-S9ggSARwfqZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cb2e33061dee0dbc"
Message-ID-Hash: RH4HUAZQBVCTTY7NEMM6X6RXVEIO3QEB
X-Message-ID-Hash: RH4HUAZQBVCTTY7NEMM6X6RXVEIO3QEB
X-MailFrom: watsonbladd@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Dennis Jackson <ietf=40dennis-jackson.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>, TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS]Re: Trust Anchor Negotiation Surveillance Concerns and Risks
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/IVDhA-4HIQrCHzfOxxpFBb79kZc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024, 11:04 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

> I don't think its possible to go one API / method at a time. If we want to
> turn on a feature by default, it has to either be non-backwards compatible
> or not break any existing API.
>
> I think I agree with you, or at least as far as saying that we really need
> to hear from implementors as to the feasibility of doing this in a
> backward-compatible and generic (not just browser/WebPKI) way.
>

Applications that don't support aren't worse off because other applications
can use a newer PKI with fewer problems.

> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
>

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status