Re: [TLS] Request for Review: Default Port for IRC via TLS/SSL

Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> Tue, 28 September 2010 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208113A6BBB for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGCcfSXj3Vvm for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068423A6B85 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so158455iwn.31 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=JkX3G57tcI4dTCFP0Q3M54XwUcpC0Xio8ne2A4nmWqI=; b=A/PhUL+Lk55nXCOrC1Qn10AvhL3da/7aryy4XA6oIoqksausrmz0W57LYqmn9/w7T1 c7qmvg8Y/CYFLTx+AoRAZJTEWiJ4+t7hPZvpYNN+hdxdMIDmGyz9c2NjEYi2kSYYbZwh Ga8WTdBMCB59Uk3hPUv4YY42TL/xsoufDryl8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=VTR3y2ujTEAL1ySqJs/gbBRTWzov+7MmlMS9MCsbuGqZgwnEdM/zT5gpykmYslte0/ Uvh6gH7+FCblYusYnim3705ar8Qi/QX92at7bKNJxS/LiHs8kEe8ELJAKM4zI6FzWzm4 ZmgcP601cl01/24iJpaM225Lmgq5pwVGbM1wE=
Received: by 10.231.15.76 with SMTP id j12mr641000iba.30.1285709864056; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.156.16 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8739stpo35.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
References: <AANLkTik0hgkwm7RRt46Q9GudvzLhd1J8CZee=N3CSJK3@mail.gmail.com> <8739stpo35.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:37:23 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimAneCo-D2j8QxRGB0mNa7K4o_HG4g=ZrCFOyh0@mail.gmail.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [TLS] Request for Review: Default Port for IRC via TLS/SSL
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:37:17 -0000

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 23:14, Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> wrote:

> It looks good to me, but I think it ought to be on the Standards Track
> rather than just Informational.

Thanks. :)

If there is a consensus that it would make sense to "upgrade" my I-D,
I don't mind going that route. In case it isn't obvious, I am new to this
and while I try to do my best & go through all documentation, I am
very glad to receive advice.


> I'm not sure this is something that is in scope for the TLS WG though,
> it seems like an Apps Area document to me.

I will contact them and ask for their opinion.


Thanks,
Richard