Re: [TLS] Channel ID and server load: comment on draft-balfanz-tls-channelid-00

Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Fri, 25 October 2013 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <agl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A5B11E8153 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8bZymXdxJMrR for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-x22f.google.com (mail-vb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB86911E833B for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m10so2509062vbh.6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=CuiCDjZs6DLBvxNZy3GUJIjMzUfKwbeoop/NfXTgZrA=; b=cbQknvzxWUStRVFSa9+HnIUBakQMgeVNebjykBITGEme5tzJPRET0vCL/jDXRZx7Da gjGEJvO6nKetRXp8JGAU0l7cGTAQz1KzptbRimC6pS/bpoYdrNHKVHeZT2pog12ZhanN oz+aVk/0796lo/l7+vMupH7YWiNMNduU21oB72oMxLfEVggOZgx1Y86ZNbVu74WPCfmr hjjOmnghLwojUFii2cMDbxWH4HlKubMyt6S47EeOzXRvh7OnBlTKHavGZZ7/S9v+SeNV KoBSLPcujSD+PWWrko0IGeVcbmsBvmbWDKUEhd3EUCQdOyMcKxejEgDxtJo3KKRzo9T0 /vmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=CuiCDjZs6DLBvxNZy3GUJIjMzUfKwbeoop/NfXTgZrA=; b=XoOvKIeBq8nfJiIv4LCRUZc45lxfloPon2dAnhi394kFdV8dfFfu/VV2JxAwsbByfU dSf1wOcxMwQlMhIhg25HSr1oCc/P9wdzP37AibilDzG4g8mtg91n5HFYHGwqKsLhHd42 ArRqR5hEcyY1DX2VSNuCcJ5lOsJ3LnoMQ0FiHUu58sUnawlOY8z8QM+U/xcReGV1lDmf BSUfsV3j2oVVsU8FAd9Ori2hcgXmX8/9jzQfcIQAmit1nIUwOdQIDXHdBRSYLbn3tnYo STsvJ4aedFxQ4C3PEumWkczdKfUgi/R7HQMfcW0qzBJMmUXVqoPxayYv2PIHbQiWfrvD /w1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnSgW8UWgTg3+yVgopuxFe/cOuOCbHkG8DMm5BPc3bKbPWpNbGwCsDn/AQVZz57EsI6XKWjQ6swo77mufjYhFHnZgQCnDGik3aP82gjLy+EJco+hwV0PKKHxyJDB45/R1PqeApD1bpHdpI4ciIzJioqgkUaOJ23kZgr4xC7sJyEYQSApaOJy/88b3b8/oDo7Jn/IhIY
X-Received: by 10.52.105.195 with SMTP id go3mr4178339vdb.24.1382713341617; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.100.40 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ8ZG0eCSCy+PZozRYogctUFqdhb6N5wv8dX4EkVM9A7UrHbQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACsn0cnzTuyezaCj0AmxtV_-6a04TZeAJtbBovAUQQfy16ua7w@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9PXLxdAGK2E5577xHJGexQpEWwrbC_Y+otEQmWfv2pV211HQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0c=4HHw3PfCsRxnuHf+Rca1GrOSi60OjJQ4qoJKGcP60Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGZ8ZG2vF5qK+qv5vQ+J5szFU_E0dTbCmbXLupCfaBZq+se3cg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9PXLy_o+sW7sur+8Gko=uq83LnYbMJuAnScV1PXytEttyCLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGZ8ZG0eCSCy+PZozRYogctUFqdhb6N5wv8dX4EkVM9A7UrHbQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:02:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL9PXLz97hHhJ=uqNdLiAPOLTi35z8QE=HDk7zbjuNmgZXimfQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Channel ID and server load: comment on draft-balfanz-tls-channelid-00
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:02:32 -0000

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Trevor Perrin <trevp@trevp.net>; wrote:
> But I'd like to see more analysis of why
> public-key was chosen for ChannelID, in light of computation costs.

That sounds very reasonable, but I fear that I only have insight into
a small part of the design here and can't usefully talk on this point.
I'll see if I can pin Dirk down on it.


Cheers

AGL