Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA registry rules for cipher suites
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 31 March 2016 17:08 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23B912D699 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.841
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.841 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tV7wYoKdZG0f for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18F4512D690 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.10.140] ([200.89.69.175]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MbOoG-1aSumT3km4-00Imp7; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:08:42 +0200
To: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <20DDE657-E1A9-4705-936D-40673294C4EB@sn3rd.com> <56FD2A0A.1050607@gmx.net> <56FD4A42.2080100@akamai.com> <56FD4E32.5060409@gmx.net> <56FD55E3.9060605@akamai.com>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <56FD599D.2040206@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 19:08:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56FD55E3.9060605@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VxIPfexktEw8nIVpgh5an1maIdd9seCX9"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:yWnWGV4Gqw7ne/1ArQKrrqZSFS9XKRpFgdKgH+NNGhELdDYA2Y/ vHoyHL+2xu2fWHE8rOgeg7ETUyVaCdixY6a4V0l+nd4b42ceWfCn5dzTQUz1C1S7OTZcCOq WSYrR+i3lOtgrNSxFTFJreG75Lphkb6BFg7IGMS3fB7DQ48Q5lusBg54rHIKITVNYylm5ZS AouyYpI4wboTFv53j8grA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:bqZ2749/1X4=:uByybO8LlcVcYyU3V4HWCB rrUKEvEPBr0YjnoJacewu9+ftwHrDKKcIcIGGgLMoZksqH7pbyn6L4s7gf0BJcTdoCw5ALm1h 3FUGz/wo33PEDajLCyEzDuDxGhiLSSPxmPiw76yac5K2rj0ElLMexuaqgtRu7qiBRTVazTbbe ohX/AIoTX9HjgvGJ44vB/z0nrChWhwKtRwgXqDUwCioYyTlkpp+7VASRCljL2y9u+4ohiaZI7 ubCSEOLP1sZO7uDllCiMRjeYkrySnLLAG96ILuF+FVfSMbFitetVXz6QPGnmU8plL/O/1I3rt sJl/pGt43ZRhQ8UEcBbT8/DPjKiZnpMrcUycQvwHw03KQIUry0Qpe5toVH/FlD0sDgg4ODGaP 1aCFzMzBiArmySLsI2PMHbFe82Jewdcb3GCGtGcY8cfrxiF7HUdk6I272UjSRfQQS3vkpfqnr K2LPiyfokeZhI885cOpHs2VjoRBaWNL/3zfr/DKshw060VNa9XlcfKePyqRpAq/oE7611Jubg 3QZzK2rWNji5Z86/aOJm/eUTrsWNjcqF6GSNfmvIHQE0nqYGyv2aoVCS95JMul9agXTw+L2jF BzbIUGyIm4TYV+cnMsx1zbU1tD18rGjXjsM+QNSTzSjKh/lu8fhLZjilCDCh+mdbZq8dNPtCU E3vTmVUtTVCmyCR/Bn9DDo7uT5sbSILoZm4loWnZ25gNuZ0Bb6dzO1KABMQjd0D22KHwrQgKQ hl4GBYCaZcRTNTO5xbvbzcOdpnH9/twYAji7fudjSW9lE6Dck6dAH9ibhxU=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/IxIWhtYFuMqGo_KoQLxyZwdCeuQ>
Subject: Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA registry rules for cipher suites
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:08:51 -0000
In essence you are saying that most people are not going to care about the Y/N in the IANA table anyway. Somewhat similar to people not understanding the difference between the different types of RFCs. That sounds pragmatic. Ciao Hannes On 03/31/2016 06:52 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On 03/31/2016 11:20 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> just think about the mentioned JPAKE extension: what type of deployment >> can you expect? It is something that Thread decided to use. Will Thread, >> as a mesh networking technology, be successful and widely be deployed? >> We don't know yet but if it becomes a technology of choice for use with >> IEEE 802.15.4 then it will be fairly widely used in the IoT sector. I am >> sure the authors of the Thread specifications (and the members of the >> Thread consortium) expect their stuff to be widely used (in IoT -- not >> on the Web). > > Well, for JPAKE in particular, my thoughts focus on my perception that > PAKE of any form is not really central to what TLS does. Given that, I > personally would not advocate for a 'Y' for it, even knowing that it > might see wide use in IoT. > >> Is this something that is good enough for this group? Web guys will >> hardly care about it. A large part of the TLS group is focused on the >> Web use only (at least that's my impression). >> >> From the descriptions provided by Sean I don't know whether this is >> something that would be a "Y" blessing or not. This is what I call >> "sounds nice but ...". >> > > Well, I would expect the authors to put the 'Y' in their IANA > considerations text and see if anyone complained during the last calls. > I further expect that some of the web-centric folks on this list would > complain and probably get the 'Y' removed, but I am not seeing why this > is problematic. > > -Ben >
- [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA registr… Sean Turner
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Dmitry Belyavsky
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Henrick Hellström
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Henrick Hellström
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Sean Turner
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Sean Turner
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Bill Frantz
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Rick van Rein
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Rick van Rein
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Dang, Quynh (Fed)
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Rick van Rein
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Phil Lello
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Kaduk, Ben
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Phil Lello
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Aaron Zauner
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Sean Turner
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Dang, Quynh (Fed)
- Re: [TLS] call for consensus: changes to IANA reg… Sean Turner