Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*

Melinda Shore <> Sat, 19 November 2016 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D1B1294FD for <>; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:22:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XrQYB-TPt2ot for <>; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B6FA1293FD for <>; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id p66so109121842pga.2 for <>; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:22:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=5EDVyXNLwZk6KoEIs4lr+UKjsIpZT329Ew4GRD+oAlY=; b=crS/W1jkSexGRdQ8Yg7rc40fxGCDKfX6TQewS/L3Qu45xyRN+CIhnDlVp4/ymJkSfu M+D738BKUPcehs9YrewCJMHORzFDNcmJ53a/bxaQQf19GUEwHNlgag19nncnZPsq/LpH GcJiZf9qj25zquMWk5yqJNNP7YDaVvKP85CshLmRMVriRz/iwSfhsfUHTREANOiC5XSx w+r3vLWuq2YRDVC7eksm+oZ2c5bVidoKNAP6k6c9Nd3Mpp4QQlxwmTVEXLGHa0m9LlSw Wy5RafNYv8XMsMeCEsI/U3xAufz5pj9relbEfmaEv5WmS/6XUpF/3LoWC2rsopGh5A1o 695w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=5EDVyXNLwZk6KoEIs4lr+UKjsIpZT329Ew4GRD+oAlY=; b=MrynnGLIljzbzC2XDPXURQxpoz2ld+EXB+d5UOsPGsqUl3NZefA4oY10xhPM2KpkHO ku8TGH6yRMFKawf4t0IkVxIHXDIa3cDA4xuhcki6+tIEUK9Qwwiv9WHK5hAIgOOcXM3S QehsQqNnjJM5ePyPZQvSy5Z6LQufRviaGfoJQUWxk/yGQs+KKMMSrVeLZY5nA701EtKS cOWR+LLE/OLBnxyXMeGH+6nzIfdgqvrfZKFhWcrlpprZZHec5YU2Ez7aSwet+lA4Npfz FTQPtMtYYsH0Xgee9W6A2mPHQ6X607hmP6I7fB6S8mDTvBCJpkfouDltFNfDdcxQLAvr jvGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03mdNe4on1acs1xIn/LcnmTWak8xUcKvx5gB44tBSo65TonGKe5nItC0qhKqgL5RQ==
X-Received: by with SMTP id l21mr6362635pgj.102.1479525773792; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:22:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local ( []) by with ESMTPSA id a11sm537729pfe.96.2016. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:22:53 -0800 (PST)
To: Martin Thomson <>, Peter Gutmann <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
From: Melinda Shore <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:22:49 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pD4cRTQb5MqjIIhUout2r4HDCKObCjuBg"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS*
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 03:22:56 -0000

On 11/18/16 2:18 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> In the end, it's just a label.

Well, there are some semantics to it - I think a label
can be more than just a label.

It occurred to me that it's guaranteed that if it's
rebranded as TLS 4 we'll have people showing up with
internet drafts proposing TLS 2 and 3, much like we've
got occasional proposals for IPv5 (or other various
versions).  That said, I figure that's only a problem
to the extent that calories are burned in response to
these proposals, and what will matter is whether or
not it's likely to lead systems administrators and
those bringing up services to make bad configuration
and deployment decisions.