[TLS] fyi: paper on compelled, certificate creation attack and applicable appliance

=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Wed, 24 March 2010 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD923A6D88 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.465
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UYe+u3KKKHi4 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound-mail-158.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-158.bluehost.com []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 809CE3A6D76 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20462 invoked by uid 0); 24 Mar 2010 21:08:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) ( by cpoproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2010 21:08:06 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kingsmountain.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=RVEnFYyUcNMcHDwLQiCreO52R11ASILD6Qnzdiz9HqCMJ1FeCdFfb+qKbjYkqyW9DeUKp8ws0VoeaevygiCebLmDeYL2xqlFuQPXSGB73P7hW+qJ+DR+1k+LtOnxnCm3;
Received: from dhcp-wireless-open-abg-24-206.meeting.ietf.org ([]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1NuXo6-00012D-7B; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:08:06 -0600
Message-ID: <4BAA7F31.5050706@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:08:01 -0700
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird (X11/20100317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: certid@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:smtp auth authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] fyi: paper on compelled, certificate creation attack and applicable appliance
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:07:59 -0000


This paper introduces a new attack, the
compelled certificate creation attack, in which
government agencies compel a certificate au-
thority to issue false SSL certificates that are
then used by intelligence agencies to covertly
intercept and hijack individuals' secure Web-
based communications. We reveal alarming ev-
idence that suggests that this attack is in ac-
tive use. Finally, we introduce a lightweight
browser add-on that detects and thwarts such

------- Forwarded Message

Date:    Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:34:27 -0400
From:    Dave Farber <dave@farber.net>
To:      "ip" <ip@v2.listbox.com>
Subject: [IP] Surveillance via bogus SSL certificates

Begin forwarded message:

 > From: Matt Blaze <mab@crypto.com>
 > Date: March 24, 2010 3:09:19 PM EDT
 > To: Dave Farber <dave@farber.net>
 > Subject: Surveillance via bogus SSL certificates

 > Dave,
 > For IP if you'd like.
 > Over a decade ago, I observed that commercial certificate
 > authorities protect you from anyone from whom they are unwilling to
 > take money.  That turns out to be wrong; they don't even do that.
 > Chris Soghoian and Sid Stamm published a paper today that describes
 > a simple "appliance"-type box, marketed to law enforcement and
 > intelligence agencies in the US and elsewhere, that uses bogus
 > certificates issued by *any* cooperative certificate authority to
 > act as a "man-in-the-middle" for encrypted web traffic.
 > Their paper is available at http://files.cloudprivacy.net/ssl-mitm.pdf
 > What I found most interesting (and surprising) is that this sort of
 > surveillance is widespread enough to support fairly mature, turnkey
 > commercial products.    It carries some significant disadvantages
 > for law enforcement -- most particularly it can be potentially can
 > be detected.
 > I briefly discuss the implications of this kind of surveillance at http://www
 > Also, Wired has a story here: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/packet
- -forensics/
 > -matt

- -------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

------- End of Forwarded Message