IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5288 (4694)

Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> Mon, 16 May 2016 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406DD12D57A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2016 17:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aEYwGqTRC54o for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 May 2016 17:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B91B12D577 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2016 17:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id s184so195994794vkb.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 May 2016 17:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OiwfyYimwp1QivbYiuDBms48mD8FnKYMlZ1kEefZmPo=; b=i3D9wt5jvss3maNiMqy05ncfD+0KAvKUFlZqYjuBtIMNFYR43yCNXfe1Gpm+l/L2Mq MukAF+LC7KJtJ/iYE/xPYKcIjHsveO4jK80BpZ+b1EqoY8h7ZQRTFjKJyY4I29bpafqR tg4KDTp190KuW95TV4W+iH8m7AGp2tUElq83ml+fi6MZxWT8+AMUw4jKZgR8UC0dbVHa GM+z56S1sKxg2xXNVJboHsN0VH+3YjaakrYCBMhap2bo/VZSMpLg0QsRAj10Mm8v4efh 4y96JUKVx5HgCZjDnvjBH1lU6pyp0BstqutzXdXvf5GAiTI48IImDDS7TzEmxyrNANE+ 1oAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OiwfyYimwp1QivbYiuDBms48mD8FnKYMlZ1kEefZmPo=; b=i9s/Oauege+VYuvKoj7ODfXVvPfTyZ7zN9YonUu91Qxm10X+jw/St/EEgctLXaJrcO wPY7fymRvwxvVl93Uk52ZDUHJ801N5XX/E0E/EQVA1yuvy+i6D3ui29j/Vre//dD9PvC lBMnPwFNxH1NuZ6YTeKKCLo8MLga+0kROiVECtcJWuI21Ux3+rHjI8qu1VWMlVqKALuV ysyT8uVsvjFxDQrt7KoBJC3WeTogk4Z8wPiUGrh8yOB4RZS419viMbk/2ZxWO5A3Htci sRCa24MQuo/k+X7jzPraqLTkcwmDIK8oEEtkZxLoU82z4hXx3vwV+O5XJhiEd+BlNp0P R4GA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWN4+u05nYcTKK0UmJ9OPCVN5xKj54XxJCCid3lht1k9YTb7OXQuPi0UhnveCkPllajXLPfXatfV3KCDw==
X-Received: by 10.159.35.116 with SMTP id 107mr1541936uae.39.1463359797200; Sun, 15 May 2016 17:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.71.89 with HTTP; Sun, 15 May 2016 17:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAN8NK9Gn9iK72dBq3opQ2E_HEZyVB+ysCqo5JxMH8vHhy4gEEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160514082717.7997D180004@rfc-editor.org> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C80CD0@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <CAN8NK9EaDQ-Pugi2j=3KcXrn5G-8mcXVs4O2HGCkH7h7GSKbbA@mail.gmail.com> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C80F76@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <CAN8NK9Gn9iK72dBq3opQ2E_HEZyVB+ysCqo5JxMH8vHhy4gEEg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 17:49:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHOTMVLisueDBzQ=WNpPd8Jd5fAi+94jF3+Yqh8O3+nAPkV+SA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1136e2f8e40d890532eb00e5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/JQ1WkwwINLz68MoRKC54b9yqUQM>
Cc: "sean+ietf@sn3rd.com" <sean+ietf@sn3rd.com>, "Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, "mcgrew@cisco.com" <mcgrew@cisco.com>, "jsalowey@cisco.com" <jsalowey@cisco.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, "abhijitc@cisco.com" <abhijitc@cisco.com>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5288 (4694)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 00:49:59 -0000

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org> wrote:

> I know that the word "nonce" does have another meaning as well (BTW I'm
> not a native english speaker, as you may have guessed). But do you think
> that is really relevant in this case? If so, could you suggest better
> wording for this specific paragraph?
>

I think "nonce" meaning number used once is fine for cryptographic
purposes.

I'd also note Adam Langley has taken to pronouncing the word nonce as
"n-once", at least at this year's RWC.

-- 
Tony Arcieri

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status