IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01.txt

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 23 October 2014 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A451A0377 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24f6DcwDhbKj for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com [72.246.2.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91BE1A8901 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E02B2852C for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:08:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com [172.17.120.126]) by prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C9728524 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:08:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas3.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04202202E for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:08:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from usma1ex-cashub5.kendall.corp.akamai.com (172.27.105.21) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 03:08:37 -0400
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([169.254.1.71]) by USMA1EX-CASHUB5.kendall.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.105.21]) with mapi; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 03:08:36 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 03:08:35 -0400
Thread-Topic: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01.txt
Thread-Index: Ac/uhqdsbumw/5GvSRWpm/eFMP6+BwACWBkg
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71D3AF64F14@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CAO7N=i3gC=+qcgHU=aMKtRyT7tZV5fm=9gJii-=yOpcNECOEvA@mail.gmail.com> <20141022175238.GF19158@mournblade.imrryr.org> <544837FD.202@cs.tcd.ie> <20141023060003.GM19158@mournblade.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141023060003.GM19158@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/JYls70xC__9kVWVffNyhicVXrKE
Subject: Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01.txt
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 07:08:40 -0000


> If excluding opportunistic security is too painful, and it is better for the draft
> to have an undiluted message than a nuanced one based on more pragmatic
> considerations, fine, so be it, make it pure.
> We'll muddle along violating it as necessary.

I believe this is the consensus.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email