Re: [TLS] Comments on EndOfEarlyData

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 16 May 2017 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9B012EC07 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 11:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oiW-20pQzcT2 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 May 2017 11:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFCBD12EC9C for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 May 2017 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3791220051C22; Tue, 16 May 2017 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=3csPntfzTi/feW /VTT44zoVBY8s=; b=alIagqhH3a4AnkGY2M8vO09iULENWs20aqpTEtqRPY7ZJ6 qJqt2PEeIlIrzrkWFe3XnCl/hiiAy6rdb4wWv3N5IiVVE07JpXNrAdUtRTxEMezD vFEZLYZEx2fikHsnx93WoHEWF2xqP3YTn0x00yWuglTKAFKUApDBabQ437tpk=
Received: from localhost (cpe-70-123-158-140.austin.res.rr.com [70.123.158.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a107.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF59320051C2E; Tue, 16 May 2017 11:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:30:30 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Cc: Britta Hale <britta.hale@item.ntnu.no>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170516183029.GH10188@localhost>
References: <83ddc562-aca3-7525-b5d6-714d2b84ae97@item.ntnu.no> <CAL02cgRGSDc9wqxYaWObnh5Aes2m8799rXOz2BPRK8_9ikd21A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgRGSDc9wqxYaWObnh5Aes2m8799rXOz2BPRK8_9ikd21A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/JYw1SpRAWsGIZTaL_LBTH-wUbBY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Comments on EndOfEarlyData
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 18:35:03 -0000

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 01:43:32PM -0400, Richard Barnes wrote:
> As has been pointed out elsewhere, other key changes are signaled with a
> handshake message (KeyUpdate), so using a handshake message seems more
> natural from a protocol point of view.

And as long as the record type goes in the clear, sending these sorts of
messages all with the same record type (handshake) seems best from a
traffic analysis p.o.v.

Nico
--