Re: [TLS] ECH-10 interop test server

Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com> Wed, 07 April 2021 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345E83A2BC6 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7VYPq3h9k0aG for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x733.google.com (mail-qk1-x733.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C8B23A2BC4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x733.google.com with SMTP id q3so203537qkq.12 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ny51i/1lbrhsQEJxfaythme/Z75X5gnZHnQBJwelHu4=; b=ZnoPoeEmgHuthKrRZ5HvvKCL8Mc88vOuM+PNAzKPqnmndZbTPCzzpru+E02j3hs+N6 lDZHAzJoSPlb9MJXwnUn/f4nNoyF+VFgoD29HaUb3g3Ihr8LDZ5njVF1lk8rusozaMva DQm2nit+C0dTyZB+x86tt5+MhtgzrnhdryHZo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ny51i/1lbrhsQEJxfaythme/Z75X5gnZHnQBJwelHu4=; b=Q0rG9ba4/c5nINkKDb49LkooJLcPRSJaX3/18jguIAQX/M0Rn+nrQiQJw06fBSzd0S 6yGh/BSw+WtCwSQt+Slct/W8kdrrHyRCZdtm9NJY/SdDKNYn8ri13JdJ0RTDhUO67Flp SfrZ/Bk9CA5OvfCuOrQPdqpgE2yvg4Y0KM+MhTWT9B5/ztSLU2riFt6D7eiSIczirtjP oqHRBIstpL+h3HrSFkH6mveYo79TQ4SxF+4u8tMevRe/2q4jvI0qhDxzupZzhgYc8ztA 0GVIHjhT18v1lPyDnqPLHRStbJVJi8lp7+76yx6Oha8EDV3obRprfbEMZsSV5SGOGg3V a2xg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530end62nYj/0Ji+HxvEwfewXpsxTxVOqMgy9EIrr4UkDMS2Rca0 MJp5Yj2KtQMceKqRbqXmYe0ytulyDIgdF2ihChYPG8Radp8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxkibwoWmiVR/IU4WVTns3w1Gw4OsrH0cIE0axuVP8YTwFa037qFla7dlqKLfWM5VjB9B0RxqiQTi22xeBavdg=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4017:: with SMTP id n23mr5181146qka.338.1617833644914; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAG2Zi23mtGwmpNSvUigOdph8y05MvWV_uGm8H0W=vbRFdZ6euw@mail.gmail.com> <0069a206-7ca9-e79c-42ae-f2c7633bcc7d@cs.tcd.ie> <05aa52f8-056d-9d68-28f0-b38513cf43ac@cs.tcd.ie> <CAG2Zi20WVBgAQiqjGTmcANsffOUyXypP3CdNozBrzd+4j764yA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Syb8mP+R84TYwKkwebfTVePuUdNi12yiCjQ1b8nLesRnQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Syb8mP+R84TYwKkwebfTVePuUdNi12yiCjQ1b8nLesRnQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Patton <cpatton@cloudflare.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:13:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG2Zi22OghstLLk=g2thXevzgPFV1wauZB7z4WgGtHQUyJaNnQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b61cc705bf693f7f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/J_w5JU1rpyoBCmEW6-6Nll8UvGo>
Subject: Re: [TLS] ECH-10 interop test server
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 22:14:11 -0000

Yup, we she it add this. Just so you know, the buck stops with me here :)
I've been meaning to build an ECH status page but haven't gotten around to
it.

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:12 PM Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:09 PM Christopher Patton <cpatton=
> 40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> (In case it helps someone else...) Is there any way that the
>>> HTTP response content could differ if ECH succeeded or not?
>>> I'm seeing the same 302 response in either case I think but
>>> maybe there's some specific pathname or something that'd
>>> result in different HTTP responses?
>>>
>>
>> That's right, we're just redirecting most HTTP requests to the spec right
>> now.
>>
>
> FWIW, I found this confusing as well. I'd expect a 200 "It worked!"
> response if ECH interoperated.
>
> thanks,
> Rob
>
>