Re: [TLS] Terminology clarification around SSL & TLS

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 31 August 2016 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8866412D0CE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3FKv2SfGq_tg for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com [23.79.238.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7655D12D0FD for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DC842374F; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:39:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com [172.27.118.250]) by prod-mail-xrelay05.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC45423748; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:39:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1472665178; bh=DbCv9ayffqCRJQTUTT158NuHp5qsAYC0eNRtSIZ2jgo=; l=382; h=From:To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=US2mEnal03c7opML3tI6D/KcoDxQaXjySsr34iNWn3IY+PHl0e+jw+j9ync9QPzFn ykmR17JicXHLrmFWQItQ/E2Siqa8A1ulMkkyQOKqxhmBhJxagvluDgrkUYflXkQLON XsphXonQug/jgQkVuw47yert8103g9ughalbYW4I=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas2.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95081FC88; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:39:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:39:38 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:39:38 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, =?utf-8?B?SnVsaWVuIMOJTElF?= <julien@trigofacile.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Terminology clarification around SSL & TLS
Thread-Index: AQHSA1pNIz/T763XOEKmK+U52V5Oz6BjihsA///MZtA=
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:39:37 +0000
Message-ID: <d6a359831ea74f99827d9194e6d05aa0@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <6b05e1f2c2bd0fb699f4650182b8ddd4@trigofacile.com> <87shtkevn1.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
In-Reply-To: <87shtkevn1.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.41.161]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/JwMz36-YQYFvakNF9RE14psVm34>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Terminology clarification around SSL & TLS
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:39:40 -0000

> i would like to continue to be able to say unambiguously that all known
> versions of SSL are badly broken and should be avoided.  Let's not muddy
> those waters further.

+1

--  
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: richsalz@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz