IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] The future of external PSK in TLS 1.3

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 01 October 2020 01:06 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180E13A0045 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uI7-X4mXrwZB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C98833A003F for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id q5so4492296ilj.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VEmAIJyKE3UU7OUyJh9UQ6OWZoAXRVSJ4E4N3slI53c=; b=kt/u7QF+/+5+IqbCiZsC88faUsMj6FsuXTt8NzFsaCacWi3ifpxLWYvkvV6iH4r4uf 89TEhlJic0cjFgO6ic7F9C1yfGxFEYcQ0A68xZ9Nxxr90mphqPovV5C/JpgHd/2ck6un iROB7GVDgkSFVAqVBBgbOxPlIpFLHWXJaSehoYgNfZ5Mnko6A6CIoIo83FC7wv0HXpAw Og7X4JbdFpZ4Pif3g/YLy7OkMSaO9neiHyZljsGmMiA3cMcGWunJ8msuPDcD37gTuT/R BBH9Qhywn2AwEexJ1C9i87iW5OqNfD2EebeChPwGLoBG0VTYeN82wGUiCmQCS6ieY/I7 DX1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VEmAIJyKE3UU7OUyJh9UQ6OWZoAXRVSJ4E4N3slI53c=; b=Ik3p0FqGn3FGyxizfgbBfEWE7lHpABl4EJELbTcZpzy/EDh8KFHf8x8NtvbZxZ7GfH 0sizb9Bi+oyFGs+zVNWWd5sQA4BrF5cZzm1CjF8D5/jDspRryCoqtOINSPsxq2gj51p3 4CWThxgxNjITFEVC0SC3X/iFivvcbqhRNANbLTzU7XuboRcAsd1+dHp+NybVlejLZPk9 1uRY+slzLOD1CIJC0O7kYAhHyVL0k7uR1fjND5PDO7V1kNRSJg3mYBeLaWYPdKW2nK0d u0UAgSVGl7SJEwUBoc/3a38dN/OHL/L3lQjA8og0w7Y7C7eIr9ebjgKWeNHD09sZVErJ C3eA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533b3CZdgSDYKQe/6ciR3A5LQp+rz+SS/CPQE1gI+ZX/fHlZPr7/ 0Q7WFzLII6HBEXpc5PNXlHcRFBUKkGrFveZY+sk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFgo+ptfiNBGXyVA0ywk0OwzG10MPfI1zsDBoTrFxQOy9lhRVGBqU3uhFFcyZL9sMfssM7tn+6N71di7oXT90=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:1952:: with SMTP id e18mr460144ilm.189.1601514393927; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACsn0c=5gsp0ivVmB-prBMXg=Ot9mo8YVzFgt-bW3G6osveggg@mail.gmail.com> <8EE5C9C0-8C51-4148-916D-54017101B2B5@ll.mit.edu> <0a38bf36-55e5-efbe-b5bb-66e0d5e85f4b@gmx.net> <2AB4BDCE-9940-47E8-8EAB-41B9BECC559D@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <2AB4BDCE-9940-47E8-8EAB-41B9BECC559D@akamai.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:06:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxYi2e8ZSFWE_uWj8CafeNvQEbZb2enT+CfLysEPFAC6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Achim Kraus <achimkraus@gmx.net>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008d83d205b091a026"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KAi7jx_IonL1drjYhEqrDLz0DdY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] The future of external PSK in TLS 1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 01:06:36 -0000

On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:12 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=
40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> PSK is in the RFC. And in fact we made a point of unifying it and other
> mechanisms in the protocol.
>

I don't really feel strongly about it (because it doesn't matter to me),
but it could be taken out of the 8446-bis document.

I might also add that not all sections of every document are viewed with
equal respect.

thanks,
Rob

v2.1.27 | Report a Bug | By Email