IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: [EXT] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3

Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com> Fri, 18 April 2025 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <loganaden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207901E071DC for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 03:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4IjkFFKBrN40 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 03:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D19C81E071D1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 03:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22c33ac23edso19260365ad.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 03:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1744971638; x=1745576438; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Qe92jvB0sWtYthQ7g3rgKXNyUreUsGwu7YWqDVyuvVA=; b=E9xDw8YkDoguTjDGxpSFwsXn1BKHbyZG7/Nsu7cmtmxQbmddkWnhpzU/dTbdlVL2MO BOvVi0UsDrOlgxI1afKBeljsACgBkLEgLFh23AqtH/IA1Icy4iCniQUbMxySZx1OkCrq LGdo6pfyWvHInchgjb64kiq05+Z4pEt+X3207D3UUWcTAhmMLi99dz5T1/syOl1f3PDs PDMhugZKNNF2eHUqP0VqzsDGVSemOPGGWKg4yHDcR/rNJQziHHoG0ewW1zYGih36tFlA njtI1uOfAHAXAqwSomJbcKRmv1czyZ7G5GcjULSnEPexddmZNAv+7dxEkYPnwDED9n1J mjpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1744971638; x=1745576438; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Qe92jvB0sWtYthQ7g3rgKXNyUreUsGwu7YWqDVyuvVA=; b=iSJmV8kcE4F2tZepQsnaC151aiH2llhuqgGdTr5n2gUPRF5e4EkZ67hvpCoqAhjIKG CjpghSnR/SVxdDYMEiSgRzDYx5lShhPnVxoaWE5mdw9nSqQ8FuwFsiDGhEPznELBcK4I +CILdGHdbE4z4QUASrooaf8QU0AioQ0meCYhN03Si0DkgGByz5jOx0/rvnR285E1Is0D jBhbBx1i0U8eVS2Z+FksJLX9wWwKP3+sqYcSVsiElWpUkv0s4P+xrOCHLI5dO7FkmSoo eIPSOYLUQfzfO9HaJz+Rpzg2AbECNaCt0mIuBgeuGxPibkyItzlgNQ1uaAxsP9WcyAMc 7kUw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVdJucSd1Av0L98A/HEY8mKyrVF0Rg/mNVzjO4D3bzDoNw65xFmQiUZdxWkg62hsC8dQXw=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz3O+sdQDfWtKoa+vpA45bcT26aGPHcVCqYGoJ0fKaYvSuc8XY6 SHEqPmuNLiCuH6z1dMU1HgXcndzb5F555FNVyQMT6csbDSb6mU0ceNk0wak7HSXXR6T3SGs6lyy 2YGh9mzlfzymkErL412X77Yhb344=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctrK4MZB4t+X5B0+4lGBnR6h/AuTg9naUkrQ3Wna/4uVKg6flng5bcfkt1B93e d+MoW72JN2wQbxB3Wll15MFgvG2dq8seGS4OgWGR0Tf+dXGeqDALupp5Cxb3H6nTZHeBImfQ7kk xW79qfaw998CYuEVvUXOHUT3xk56ECxy/9sHkAOfXgmKO/Vg66RVJ+EtrWGqAY9w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFwde98BjsUDOePbo6X7j6Dg3ZfOKMccbTBSbAZ3eE8/zZly9VclHua88kYemqUplM3Uygya0V7qUyJJ38m2Tw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:3c65:b0:223:54aa:6d15 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-22c5359a190mr40253725ad.12.1744971637875; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 03:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5dd1e81a-c37a-ceff-b89e-b4335fca07b6@nohats.ca> <56e646395f67e27ff11a092d5989c1c85eba2563.camel@aisec.fraunhofer.de> <CAOp4FwSJpvn6f=3utd4yBE=ftkXQ4h38FT3VQ1XOhrubqgu0ng@mail.gmail.com> <BN0P110MB1419E8DB9B38B33F41A6234590BCA@BN0P110MB1419.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <BN0P110MB1419E8DB9B38B33F41A6234590BCA@BN0P110MB1419.NAMP110.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:20:25 +0400
X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUFGy-Hkp3LcRAJMmUGi4sa2ZhaHAC8XITkIN8MvQFgaSGdqyPFsSV77eGU
Message-ID: <CAOp4FwRMEWsGFw-DTknd3TyW8UG+H2-ofehcFXQA5X0YwaLPyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: MN5OIDFXCLZONP7POB3D35Y3WBUOZLSL
X-Message-ID-Hash: MN5OIDFXCLZONP7POB3D35Y3WBUOZLSL
X-MailFrom: loganaden@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "Bellebaum, Thomas" <thomas.bellebaum@aisec.fraunhofer.de>, "paul.wouters@aiven.io" <paul.wouters@aiven.io>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: [EXT] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KROdbwSqbykdHhlz6iSGtB_VZNQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 21:23, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
<uri@ll.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> However, the approach of pure PQ carries risks.
>
>
>
> You consider pure-PQ risks – then don’t use it. I consider risks associated with hybrids, so my deployment will not use them. To each his own.
>
>
>
> Don’t try to stuff your perception of risks and correctness into everybody else’s throat.
Dear Uri,

I was simply explaining my point of view as someone who supported the
adoption of the draft.
It is not my intent to force my perception of risks. I am entirely
happy to discuss with you publicly
despite your opposite point of view.

It was not an easy decision for me to make. I'm still deeply worried
about potential issues in the future.

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status