Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6122)
Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl> Fri, 01 May 2020 09:47 UTC
Return-Path: <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE97F3A0D6E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2020 02:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lekensteyn.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tWUTHmqfMiAC for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2020 02:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lekensteyn.nl (mail.lekensteyn.nl [IPv6:2a02:2308::360:1:25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A3513A0D71 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2020 02:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lekensteyn.nl; s=s2048-2015-q1; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=wy0SkBWpDVQ8FjXLOmyr5uapPk2rWwzK74XhKB61Sbc=; b=XbjhR1fVNcyJI84EsPWGFGaYZdlEz9wmG374BKc/HPQP7QCf9Wq5iMs1G/LLsky29Mq7SSrL03T5wD+viBp9U8sxAWwrW7isiQ8dTR3GSUZDqdZJ4c1s+KAwpNaKMAKa5xJi6wz687ScRH5VLUP9R2vZsIAFUetjPZ53WjuM9jKJLgrsiBkUuu0LxunO68LU/YLHafjFZLjay/EpYmU1erPzOR2ykrX2mx6AJ4Ip+NceMmu/WB3xeL88nW/0yZ9Cdn62WKySkKGBcB3BzpZsAIbQ12AVb/bij6ixJV1RpX0+b7u5q7wfw6tPUAbVVy3s8gEM/jfjHwzQ6plOqN9KiA==;
Received: by lekensteyn.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <peter@lekensteyn.nl>) id 1jUSG3-0005kf-8N; Fri, 01 May 2020 11:46:59 +0200
Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 11:46:57 +0200
From: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ekr@rtfm.com, rdd@cert.org, kaduk@mit.edu, caw@heapingbits.net, joe@salowey.net, sean+ietf@sn3rd.com, research@bensmyth.com, tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200501094657.GB330395@al>
References: <20200424090811.B5E9FF4071F@rfc-editor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200424090811.B5E9FF4071F@rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/L-Eja2vlTxB1453u5gNBR0iCU9s>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6122)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 09:47:12 -0000
Hi, The original text was not wrong. Originally TLS 1.2 and before defined a PRF for key derivation, and there exist multiple instantiations with different hash functions (e.g. SHA-256 and SHA-384). So each instantiation could be considered a different function. Your suggested text can also be considered correct as there is only construction in TLS 1.2, but I don't think it is worth marking the text as in error. I suggest to reject this. Kind regards, Peter On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 02:08:11AM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8446, > "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6122 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Ben Smyth <research@bensmyth.com> > > Section: 1.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > The key derivation functions have been redesigned. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The key derivation function has been redesigned. > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8446 (draft-ietf-tls-tls13-28) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 > Publication Date : August 2018 > Author(s) : E. Rescorla > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Transport Layer Security > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
- [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6122) RFC Errata System
- Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (61… Peter Wu