Re: [TLS] DSA should die

Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg> Wed, 01 April 2015 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@ritter.vg>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629EF1AC42E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vXkF4DSTtR3M for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F88B1AC42C for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igcxg11 with SMTP id xg11so59887612igc.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ritter.vg; s=vg; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dOZ2lpi6LLtnnIYQArvM9Ej75bP+EM2OICa/PWWBkY0=; b=K4UbdJILxrZtEHr5H06GcbmtUlno7KDpX1+LueUqhLf9IS/dEf0KIkfY/pv/cr0Kvl U/m81vsTQ4GFJRqGvXyJ4udI683Z/FE9/4XoriWGOX9SjtLhKkFn+g3K0myYeAAZ+Hg9 1QiYxl49Vw2Dey/TZ2ce0SRu3I+XWTaPXso/0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dOZ2lpi6LLtnnIYQArvM9Ej75bP+EM2OICa/PWWBkY0=; b=aE/HfJnrKh9C7oYiwVxaPXdIVFJUnOnjf0d3cUzDxSg6QI+RTUZPpsqcdDyetfiMea XYbzyLucScT9OfqFFATHKuTZ7Rnp1ziu4PPWYAYOP/+0A3r1MYMAZ+5a66TZvmv3sJ3q +lC+/Uuc4OGJbhAp7Rtyf6ZSgjBBm/qutXg0FejrA8yYNyaopThNeSBKdbfQlYT3y+LQ pSjobmmEG9aZIlovGUJzHMylbHb6zl07ieaiySW2yoKEjHq/CYvy/zZXcdadpYTHM7ov CpMuRbZd/AIXBuka5qr5I+urOKdVaYm9xKudlv+z+hvRMK70jhrAUxPDtafXtcZbXzSQ Zd5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk91HrEnTRHPhn2ZQs0tGKYX2Ro00SZ5MVQaDEqiMDZZexh1oXfPXS6bvPF+LNmge4O3ixw
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.12.158 with SMTP id 30mr12513289iom.61.1427929459918; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.166.84 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.166.84 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <r422Ps-1075i-6057E82AB6334E70BA222530F8C783EA@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local>
References: <0899615E-0ADC-4474-B031-0589014D0511@gmail.com> <r422Ps-1075i-6057E82AB6334E70BA222530F8C783EA@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:04:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+cU71kF_YvsWW19ZWW51Ho42V1LA6F1mL=XCu1SkAbVA7Q56w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg>
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113dc818392d370512b1bce8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/L6f1dBcUca8v-Xd2HvJalqPZo-Y>
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] DSA should die
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 23:04:21 -0000

+1

My pet oddity was inherited DSA parameters from a certificate chain. (Don't
even know if that's supported in many implementations.)

-tom