IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] sect571r1

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Wed, 15 July 2015 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D399D1B34C3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ICxNVQKbU2gS for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 850EF1B34C2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 781A0284D68; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:11:40 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:11:40 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150715211140.GU28047@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <201507151413.22408.davemgarrett@gmail.com> <CAFR824yu2QiZ=-kR4JxhbxgvSJhi33Jq9s6v4T9qedOzKfrrfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMfhd9XBzxKDbomTXuMwjge8MPtcg97wyXdp=KRJxNn4j9tbCg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMfhd9XBzxKDbomTXuMwjge8MPtcg97wyXdp=KRJxNn4j9tbCg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/LH43pnmyWXVulE9EuEvGycBnY3w>
Subject: Re: [TLS] sect571r1
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tls@ietf.org
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:11:43 -0000

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 01:59:26PM -0700, Adam Langley wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Deirdre Connolly
> <durumcrustulum@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> So, should it stay or should it go now? Opinions?
> >
> > +1 that sect571r1 be removed.
> 
> I also believe that it should be removed.

Same here, I think in this case "less is more".  There is no
compelling reason for this curve, and needless diversity here is
counter-productive.

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status