IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Fwd: Clarification on interleaving app data and handshake records

Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> Sun, 06 December 2015 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <kurt@roeckx.be>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B8F1B3355 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 05:08:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Ya2zHy0zvd3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 05:08:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from excelsior.roeckx.be (excelsior.roeckx.be [IPv6:2a01:70:ffff:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E3051B3354 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 05:08:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from intrepid.roeckx.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by excelsior.roeckx.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A70A8A0432; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 13:08:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by intrepid.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F9181FE0573; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:08:09 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:08:08 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Message-ID: <20151206130808.GA5993@roeckx.be>
References: <20151015130040.9F1BB1A2EF@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <2977428.j4DNTR9LXR@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <20151016203610.GA5596@roeckx.be> <2348468.lpGyMim7ub@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B9B3DA@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <CACsn0ckLkgMA2xHphro-a1N3tr+NJAvRV_NvVKP2K-=7zj1OfA@mail.gmail.com> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B9B509@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4B9B509@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/LN8FTPRjyyzQZVLCihAeFv5FGac>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Fwd: Clarification on interleaving app data and handshake records
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 13:08:14 -0000

On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 01:18:51AM +0000, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> 
> I hadn't even thought it through to that point, more that you're not supposed
> to accept anything between Client Hello and Client Keyex except an optional
> Client Certificate.

Please read the start of the thread, that includes relevant RFC
sections that seem to indicate you can do this.


Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email