[TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD
Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> Fri, 03 April 2015 20:34 UTC
Return-Path: <joe@salowey.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B141A0267
for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 96Vlitk8i_mv for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com (mail-qg0-f43.google.com
[209.85.192.43])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC391A0242
for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgfi89 with SMTP id i89so16884966qgf.1
for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=E76VYKoS06NfRM1tSUwEldo01XaBORyoJe6PSE/eL+E=;
b=fpne+Q/zZt3tbd0888R5f9QL62xFuXg0LKsV5j1Um0DRTJmAQvd6JsVK5mdehTguRX
geQfFl6OxVoUH+V3jhEB+RF6QpoFkCKVDRMEQfeQTudgNYBVNEZ3pNs7mlf+feESM6pz
DhBtZzb/2+OovvACzBRapC1z+U5eXsjWQFdeetsKnRqwKMR/omexO0MYQcqrYA7n2j5J
XJb8GxIErGa7VQgcq2Dgm7EZdCiqq+F5ukvNalYcsvzr/zU6ICwWc/NREW/Iqx2XiXMK
PfNfqOMym/ZTE4ztde0tbP251LtzgO6+YX2HdQE4Hp8JY7D4YS++91vXtpgDZ0cVJl3Z
lt/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlHyzsOwvUOmtvWlhe/5J6lcNehNRmre/CMrxy2+6xf2w6S9/q3LU5McAKSMPZQwVUZwe/5
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.52.13 with SMTP id b13mr7708956qka.7.1428093255317; Fri,
03 Apr 2015 13:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.121.104 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [50.206.82.141]
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:34:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOgPGoCW-znnh5VFobCFjZafxEOcwsaHZ_eByTwpCpmqfgX=6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147806e3091290512d7dfcb
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/LUqKj956191Xl87qCciI-JphsjQ>
Subject: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working
group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>,
<mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>,
<mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 20:34:21 -0000
In the interim meeting we had consensus to use an implicit IV for AEAD. The proposal was to use the record sequence number and pad with zeros as described in pull request 155 ( https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/155/files). This was also discussed in the IETF-92 meeting in Dallas along with options to change the offset. The consensus was to stay with the original proposal. We are posting to the mailing list to confirm this consensus. If you have comments, please reply by April 17, 2015. Thanks, S&J
- [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Joseph Salowey
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Daniel Migault
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Brian Smith
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Tom Ritter
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD David Leon Gil
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Tom Ritter
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Daniel Migault
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Daniel Migault
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Michael Hamburg
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Brian Smith
- Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD Yoav Nir