[TLS] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-05 (Ends 2025-11-26)

[Watson Ladd <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I think there is no real reason to publish this document, and
publishing sends the wrong signal about hybrid vs not. We should not
publish it. Obviously there is a codepoint that people can use who
feel they need it. We specifically designed the registry policy to
allow that.

Sincerely,
Watson

On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 1:52 PM Sean Turner via Datatracker
<[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>
> Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-05 (Ends 2025-11-26)
>
> This message starts a 3-week WG Last Call for this document.
>
> Abstract:
>    This memo defines ML-KEM-512, ML-KEM-768, and ML-KEM-1024 as
>    NamedGroups and and registers IANA values in the TLS Supported Groups
>    registry for use in TLS 1.3 to achieve post-quantum (PQ) key
>    establishment.
>
> File can be retrieved from:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem/
>
> Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
> publication of this document by replying to this email keeping [e-mail]
> in copy. Objections should be motivated and suggestions to resolve them are
> highly appreciated.
>
> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded again of the
> Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79
> [1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
> provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of
> any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can
> be found at [3].
>
> Thank you.
>
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]



-- 
Astra mortemque praestare gradatim