Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenges with TLS 1.3
Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> Thu, 30 September 2021 15:32 UTC
Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27463A0D6A
for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=YW9SeFKH;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=vLgUmYpr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Gt9PudCtsYBn for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com
[64.147.123.24])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1B813A0D63
for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45])
by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF753201487
for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:32:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91])
by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:32:27 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net;
h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to
:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=da6uz
66AdAIp2TL8OgDBE6g1rC7a8xZMNTd/o8sDd8I=; b=YW9SeFKHqOjFdjRBNlGtS
/Oj083i+64k/nxl8Jwytqne28z+EhBkV0sFKuPbdPLRXWlffrgd+VsjbXwDZTqUf
F76zRs++72ARgXg1pzBYI8KofxzdKnddSWB6gi7Q+lSqg1v5jTCNcbTfHyftTTY+
sGFzMDJy9PTB1tvcHW90eOuqE+6pqtfVXRO/QB5ShkGXToCfAyk3gTrVZ/QnlnU0
dZZ3RBjTvaaeNtlVEdkT7XKQyh9ukmZ1hEDZMKbw55QmAQiCAoMBu+okEdONgkgM
b4v3iqVjmgJRvk5FfVMK9Ck/UWdYd0TCGffOdWtK3JCyH/6yE82gkilO1O1Zr4d2
A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=da6uz66AdAIp2TL8OgDBE6g1rC7a8xZMNTd/o8sDd
8I=; b=vLgUmYprEAVNtz+30bj9DWQU39HgojuXXMiPVYrP4efcJL/zak9X+wdXj
h8yk1Z/EA2Hn8okpl/9bEYAon3xuIoZjMwqBhHUaoNFGjI4afyEpyb23L0lGIbJp
XuI8UZ+cFXbRoeJIkXJ6f9OFxtSvdwk96B2Mj0oN8d0IxhV6OpxWji6fUoVFZhsW
KycbvZDcbKwhwuAldT5QdXui1Bt9yRq27b5CDdAshsCiBiYSoFbkH2jjynPhGOCH
ABFE3646UgFY4E9zkFRCpoM8MYqhq5iPNIWP0gIliw9nSW2l1yllPhr54FQdDTj/
ncRQ21IAlGbljxXHIN6/Ad0YnIfmw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ithVYe47yjxrLAS84uyn5gjIkmlz2kFiAgloe7B1Qc7OgzT8dMryyQ>
<xme:ithVYX50UX9_OKHTWtq66DlgS84e5Jk9_HljdAdYSCKq_s9WaP3FzjrO8QGsN0-a6
Y69mWszv_fRvGH3T_g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudekgedgkeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtgfesth
hqredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdevhhhrihhsthhophhhvghrucghohhougdfuceotggr
fieshhgvrghpihhnghgsihhtshdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheetleekie
dukeefgfevleeuudelffffteelfefggfejvdfftdfhtddvffdttdfgnecuffhomhgrihhn
pegvuhhrohhprgdrvghupdhivghtfhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtne
curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegtrgifsehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ithVYdcl4AMFAPvjjR4_ZBSyO1gURQuegBILmATHgjWWQgayoRayIA>
<xmx:ithVYbKyhqH0Ev3O5n8wiYH6EY1QYO0jWIe_RaqDfUAbrxc3bYEvGA>
<xmx:ithVYSLGQR90kYJ0VYGg9vEstEriq5Xafi-sQ-Ps99WAqujy_Xe8vA>
<xmx:ithVYXX2AHlKD5z8gVZLonv0DbUREYax4LQkfzU7APFsWEKEZicHCQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 4A3973C0821; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:32:26 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1322-g921842b88a-fm-20210929.001-g921842b8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <2bc24cf8-228c-46c8-94b4-8bf7ea5195ff@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <904eecc0-9624-7a57-b1f1-9ec4457bd74d@gmail.com>
References: <5987C38E-8FEA-441D-8975-ABB9906276BA@akamai.com>
<78802a08-da04-5197-21be-26eac6ad29f6@cs.tcd.ie>
<4b2cfadd-3fdf-cb3f-c1df-3a8ef80f63bf@gmail.com>
<10162829a33201ef98edda841ec6e66e67801c09.camel@ruff.mobi>
<904eecc0-9624-7a57-b1f1-9ec4457bd74d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:32:05 -0700
From: "Christopher Wood" <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/MdM8IApdQEHx0jvYnFAhWBWHaVo>
Subject: Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenges with TLS 1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working
group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>,
<mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>,
<mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 15:32:36 -0000
Hi folks, This line of discussion is not appropriate for this mailing list. Please take it elsewhere. Best, Chris, for the chairs On Thu, Sep 30, 2021, at 6:54 AM, Tony Rutkowski wrote: > Ruslan, > > Speaking as as a lawyer has participated in many EU proceedings over > several decades, your assertion here is not accurate. A European > Council Resolution is by definition a "legal document." It was adopted > on 14 Dec 2020 after an extensive policy making proceeding and > consultations among EU Members over more than a year, and the subject > of > a vote by a EU governing body. See > https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/12/14/encryption-council-adopts-resolution-on-security-through-encryption-and-security-despite-encryption/# > > As the Council's site notes, its Resolutions "set up political > commitments or positions." See > https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/council-eu/conclusions-resolutions/ > > The point here was that the NCCoE activity - as many similar ones in > other technical bodies - is fully consonant with adopted European policy > (paid for by EU Member taxpayers). It is also properly the subject of > notice by the IETF. What seem inappropriate is characterising > alternative views on these matters as "not fine," or "I'm glad I'm not a > tax payer in a jurisdiction that's encouraging people to weaken the > security properties this WG has tried hard to improve" or denigrating > the integrity of a government agency because they don't agree with your > views. > > It is also worthy of note that shutting down discussion on the IETF TLS > list seems highly dependent on the views being articulated. > > --tony > > On 30-Sep-21 2:30 AM, Ruslan N. Marchenko wrote: >> First of all EC Resolution is not a legal document, it's a legal >> initiative. The resolution is a "call for action" but not an action >> per se - there's no legal consequence other than it is possible to >> bring this initiative now to european parliament. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
- [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenges wi… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenge… Deirdre Connolly
- Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenge… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenge… Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenge… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenge… Ruslan N. Marchenko
- Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenge… Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenge… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenge… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenge… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [TLS] NIST on addressing visibility challenge… Christopher Wood