Re: [TLS] WG adoption: draft-nir-tls-rfc4492bis

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 27 November 2014 22:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A90C1A00D8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:21:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tj2MNSKJgyVF for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:21:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311F41A0019 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:21:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l2so7491496wgh.27 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:21:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kV4g0rff4+jGYTc+36izkE29hZ18+i05HbvVtpY7Gq0=; b=aUpZfPg0wgGsAN/T9nThDGgiXPPr/n6K41KAEnLmRA9qCtZph8HGpICRUBTB/NDnmS X70NXxfTZAJzdKS7/NOhomsvuReWYTUUDIHgcMbAE4vTLk+cd2EAbf5HqEbvOrfoj3nq aXVo/3gmFQu6TQ0QsMHKnHDIWx+D7IhIetUiHMpkUasqynM2l5NTV9AnUK1t4Fe1DPPt 9f+yak1nkxL0nbuDMu5kPXMJFrXSOQHn6hCKN56NU4s8ZuSOz4CCG+79oJ8/pplKEEjf oVPr1kXQdgUdPW2J9YHRZQ4ll0KH3LHRMQgkCWdGObOPXPT4SqK7oF2AvhthiZZgSEP7 EZVw==
X-Received: by 10.180.81.7 with SMTP id v7mr54231509wix.74.1417126910002; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.104] (IGLD-84-228-139-23.inter.net.il. [84.228.139.23]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mw7sm13377573wib.14.2014.11.27.14.21.48 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:21:49 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1DCDF76-5CA4-442C-852B-30A88EF3B1B1@pahtak.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:21:47 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <12F35B29-212B-43D4-AC5E-239EB3D9BF9A@gmail.com>
References: <AA93BAA4-5C5F-4969-8DF6-A83287D80F6D@ieca.com> <AFF9C4EE-6BCA-4AA6-BAB5-A457CDCC67AA@gmail.com> <D1DCDF76-5CA4-442C-852B-30A88EF3B1B1@pahtak.org>
To: Stephen Checkoway <s@pahtak.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Mpg4rpGAXaxghbn9xKm5vop4d_E
Cc: "TLS@ietf.org (tls@ietf.org)" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption: draft-nir-tls-rfc4492bis
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:21:53 -0000

> On Nov 27, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s@pahtak.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:13 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Seeing as the 18th has come and gone, can I take the near silence as confirmation that I can resubmit as a WG draft?
> 
> I support adopting this draft.
> 
> Maybe this isn't the right time to ask, but I think I'm misunderstanding a part of it.


Hi, Stephen

What Martin said.

Once this is accepted and -00 submitted would be a great time to raise this or make a pull request to get rid of this (IMO silly) restriction.

Yoav